Comments on the acceptance and rejection of sentences in theology

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 54 (1):99-113 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This work is interdisciplinary as it lies at the crossroads of three disciplines: philosophy, theology, and logic. The article attempts to discuss the way in which sentences (judgements) are accepted and rejected within theology. First, the role of the argument of authority in theology is discussed. Subsequently, the most important types of theorems with certain degrees of theological certainty were identified. Finally, censorship was presented as a means of rejecting theorems in theology. Finally, censorship was indicated as a model for philosophical-logical research on denial.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Efficacious and Sufficient Grace.Heidi Russell - 2010 - Philosophy and Theology 22 (1-2):353-372.
Conditioning acceptance or rejection of information.B. R. Bugelski & Michel Hersen - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (4):619.
Relation between Perceived Parental Acceptance and Intimate Partner Acceptance in Turkey: Does History Repeat Itself?Azm Varan - 2005 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 33 (3):414-426.
The interpretation of questions in dialogue.Alex Lascarides & Nicholas Asher - 2009 - Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung, Vol. 13, No. 1.
Protestant perspectives on natural theology.Russell Re Manning - 2013 - In J. H. Brooke, F. Watts & R. R. Manning (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology. Oxford Up.
Rituals of knowing: rejection and relation in disability theology and Meister Eckhart.Daniel G. W. Smith - 2018 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 79 (3):279-294.
Peer review: Agreement and disagreement. [REVIEW]Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (3):534-536.
On the logic of acceptance and rejection.Anna Gomolińska - 1998 - Studia Logica 60 (2):233-251.
Weak Rejection.Luca Incurvati & Julian J. Schlöder - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (4):741-760.


Added to PP

16 (#912,482)

6 months
6 (#531,083)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Foundations of mathematical logic.Haskell Brooks Curry - 1963 - New York: Dover Publications.
Assertion, denial, and the liar paradox.Terence Parsons - 1984 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 13 (2):137 - 152.
Embedding Denial.David Ripley - 2015 - In Colin R. Caret & Ole T. Hjortland (eds.), Foundations of Logical Consequence. Oxford University Press. pp. 289-309.
Certainty.Baron Reed - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A paradox of rejection.Thomas N. P. A. Brouwer - 2014 - Synthese 191 (18):4451-4464.

View all 7 references / Add more references