The endowment tax puzzle

Philosophy and Public Affairs 38 (3):240-271 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Unlike the traditional earnings tax which is based on the individual’s actual income, the endowment tax is based on the individual’s maximum potential income. The endowment tax raises a frightful prospect: an individual taxed according to her potential income as, say, a corporate lawyer might be forced to give up her preferred occupation as a philosophy professor and to work as a corporate lawyer in order to pay her taxes. Although this seems to be an impermissible intrusion on freedom, the challenge is to specify why the endowment tax is impermissible in a way that does not rule out all forms of taxation. After showing why the solutions put forward by John Rawls and by Liam Murphy and Thomas Nagel fail, I provide my own solution. I claim that the endowment tax is impermissible not because it forecloses more options but because of which options it forecloses. Thus, in order to explain the impermissibility of the endowment tax, we first need to distinguish the options to which individuals have a legitimate moral claim. I suggest one way of drawing this distinction by appealing to two principles widely embraced in the philosophical literature. If my argument is right, then the income tax as it is currently implemented is also morally impermissible.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,659

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The uneasy case for capital taxation.Edward J. McCaffery - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (2):166-184.
A Humean Theory of Property Rights.Ira K. Lindsay - 2015 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
Three Views of Tax.Edward Mccaffery - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 18 (1).
Changing Places, Changing Taxes: Exploiting Tax Discontinuities.Julie Roin - 2021 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 22 (1):335-379.
Turning the Tide on Tax.Martin O'Neill - 2015 - In Daisy-Rose Srblin (ed.), Values Added: Rethinking Tax for the 21st Century. Fabian Society. pp. 11-16.
Ethical Standards for Tax Planning by Corporations.Ave-Geidi Jallai - 2019 - In Robert F. Van Brederode (ed.), Ethics and Taxation. Springer Singapore. pp. 207-231.


Added to PP

214 (#98,445)

6 months
10 (#396,711)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kristi A. Olson
Bowdoin College

Citations of this work

Justice and Taxation.Daniel Halliday - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (12):1111-1122.
Can liberal egalitarians protect the occupational freedom of the economically talented?Joseph Mazor - 2018 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 21 (6):703-725.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references