Will a human always outsmart a computer?

Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 73:259-280 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The title question of the paper has its empirical origin in the form of an individual’s existential experience arising from the personal use of a computer, which we attempt to describe in the first section. The rest of the entire paper can be understood as a philosophical essay answering the question posed. First the connection between the main problem of the article and its “premonition” by mankind, which was expressed in the form of ancient myths and legends, is briefly suggested. After shortly discussing the problems that early considerations of AI focused on, i.e. whether machines can think at all, we move on to reformulate our title question, about the possibility of outsmarting AI. This outsmarting will be understood by us in a rather limited way as to prevent a machine from completing its implemented task. To achieve this objective, after softly clarifying the basic terms, an analogy is built between the “outsmarting” of a machine by a human (the target domain) and the playing of a mathematical game between two players (the base domain), where this outsmarting is assigned a “winning strategy” in the certain game. This mathematical model is formed by games similar to Banach-Mazur games. The strict theorems of such games are then proved and applied to the target of the analogy. We then draw conclusions and look for counter-examples to our findings. The answer to the title question posed is negative, and it is not clear how far it should be taken seriously.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Winning the Pressing down Game but Not Banach-Mazur.Jakob Kellner, Matti Pauna & Saharon Shelah - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (4):1323 - 1335.
Game, player, ethics: A virtue ethics approach to computer games.Miguel Sicart - 2005 - International Review of Information Ethics 4 (12):13-18.
Computer games, education, and the good life.Mark Coeckelbergh - 2010 - In Frej Edvardsen & Halsten Kulle (eds.), Educational Games. Nova Science Publishers. pp. 323-329.
Game ethics-Homo Ludens as a computer game designer and consumer.Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic & Thomas Larsson - 2005 - International Review of Information Ethics 4 (12):19-23.
Baire spaces and infinite games.Fred Galvin & Marion Scheepers - 2016 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 55 (1-2):85-104.
Human and machine logic: A rejoinder.John R. Lucas - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):155-6.
Serious games e simulazione come risorse per l’educazione.Luca Mori - 2012 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 4 (1):56-72.
Game cultures: computer games as new media.Jon Dovey - 2006 - New York, NY: Open University Press. Edited by Helen W. Kennedy.
Message Exchange Games in Strategic Contexts.Nicholas Asher, Soumya Paul & Antoine Venant - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 46 (4):355-404.


Added to PP

13 (#1,037,980)

6 months
6 (#522,810)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references