When Scientists Deceive: Applying the Federal Regulations

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (2):344-350 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Deception is a useful methodological device for studying attitudes and behavior, but deceptive studies fail to fulfill the informed consent requirements in the U.S. federal regulations. This means that before they can be approved by Institutional Review Boards, they must satisfy the four regulatory conditions for a waiver or alteration of these requirements. To illustrate our interpretation, we apply the conditions to a recent study that used deception to show that subjects judged the same wine as more enjoyable when they believed it had a higher price

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why is Coerced Consent Worse Than No Consent and Deceived Consent?David Wendler & Alan Wertheimer - 2017 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42 (2):114-131.
Tort-Agency Partnerships in an Age of Preemption.Catherine M. Sharkey - 2014 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 15 (2):359-386.
Informed Consent in Pediatric Research.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (4):346-358.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
59 (#346,644)

6 months
8 (#513,029)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?