Utilitas 16 (1):1-11 (2004)

Onora O'Neill
Cambridge University
Both consequentialist and non-consequentialist ethical reasoning have difficulties in accounting for the value of consequences. Taken neat, consequentialism is too fierce in its emphasis on success and disregard of luck, while non-consequentialism seemingly over-values inner states and undervalues actual results. In UneasyVirtue Julia Driver proposes a form of objective consequentialism which claims that characters are good if they typically (but not invariably) produce good results. This position addresses the problems moral luck raises for consequentialism, but requires some form of realism about traits of character. However, if our knowledge of mental states is ascriptive, this form of objective consequentialism may make excessive demands. Non-consequentialists may gain in so far as the theories of action to which they are typically committed are less demanding, and are built to take account of the typical or systematic connections between states of character and results of action
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0953820803001018
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,008
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Aesop's Fox: Consequentialist Virtue Meets Egocentric Bias.Dale L. Clark - 2009 - Philosophical Psychology 22 (6):727 – 737.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Consequentialism and Side Constraints.Daniel Nolan - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (1):5-22.
Do Consequentialists Have One Thought Too Many?Elinor Mason - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (3):243-261.
A Dilemma for Rule-Consequentialism.Jussi Suikkanen - 2008 - Philosophia 36 (1):141-150.
Truth or Consequences? Generative Versus Consequential Justification in Science.Thomas Nickles - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:393 - 405.
Integrity and Impartial Morality.Greg Scherkoske - 2012 - Dialogue 51 (2):289-312.
The Limits of Consequentialism.Donald C. Hubin - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:167-176.
Moral Intuitionism, Experiments and Skeptical Arguments.Mark van Roojen - 2014 - In Anthony Booth & Darrell Rowbottom (eds.), Intuitions. Oxford University Press.
"What Else Could I Do?" The Self-Definition of Consequentialists.Gary M. Atkinson - 2001 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 4 (3).
Elbow-Room for Consequentialists.Frances Howard-Snyder - 1992 - Analysis 52 (4):249 - 253.
Egoists, Consequentialists, and Their Friends.William H. Wilcox - 1987 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 16 (1):73-84.


Added to PP index

Total views
273 ( #33,224 of 2,439,465 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #433,243 of 2,439,465 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes