II. Nozick's entitlements

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 19 (1-4):468-481 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article examines Nozick's claim (in Anarchy, State and Utopia) to have shown that a commitment to individual liberties requires acceptance of full capitalist property rights. The main gap in Nozick's argument is that he fails to show how individuals can become entitled to full control over previously unheld resources. Nozick draws on Locke's view that title is acquired by ?mixing one's labour?. But he excises certain (dubious) premisses on which Locke's theory relies and provides no alternative grounds for thinking that the labourer is entitled to full control over his product



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,623

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

207 (#101,032)

6 months
25 (#143,119)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Onora O'Neill
Cambridge University

References found in this work

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Locke on property.J. P. Day - 1966 - Philosophical Quarterly 16 (64):207-220.
Of civil government.John Locke & William Seal Carpenter - 1924 - New York,: E.P. Dutton. Edited by William Seal Carpenter.
Zu Lockes Lehre vom Privateigentum.Reinhard Brandt - 1972 - Kant Studien 63 (1-4):426-435.

Add more references