Loar’s Puzzle, Similarity, and Knowledge of Reference

Manuscrito 42 (2):1-45 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In ‘The Semantics of Singular Terms’ (1976) Brian Loar proposed a famous case where a hearer seems to misunderstand an utterance even though he has correctly identified its referent. Loar’s case has been used to defend a model of communication where speaker and hearer must think of the referent in similar ways in order for communication to succeed. This ‘Similar Ways of Thinking’ (SW) theory is extremely popular, both in the literature on Loar cases and in other philosophical discussions. My goal is to offer a novel argument against this influential model of communication and propose an alternative picture. First, I show how a certain version of SW fails to solve Loar’s puzzle. Then I point at a more general problem with SW, arguing that no version of this model can account for Loar-style cases without making the conditions for communication too strict. I then propose an alternative account of Loar cases, analyzing them as cases of luck where the hearer does not know that she has identified the referent correctly. I conclude by contrasting my view with other existing accounts of Loar cases.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Brian Loar on singular terms.Michael Devitt - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 37 (3):271 - 280.
Referential Intentions and Communicative Luck.Andrew Peet - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (2):379-384.
Loar's defence of physicalism.Stephen Law - 2004 - Ratio 17 (1):60-67.
Reference, Understanding, and Communication.Ray Buchanan - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (1):55-70.
Self-interpretation and the constitution of reference.Brian Loar - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8:51-74.
Troubles with Direct Reference.Pierre Baumann - 2012 - Fenomenologia. Diálogos Possíveis Campinas: Alínea/Goiânia: Editora da Puc Goiás 93:33-51.
Proper nouns.Samuel Cumming - 2007 - Dissertation, Rutgers - New Brunswick
The Puzzle of False Judgement in the Theaetetus.Nathanael Stein - 2016 - Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy 61 (3):260–283.
The Varities of Reference.Brian Loar - 1984 - Philosophical Books 25 (1):46-51.
Reference from the first person perspective.Brian Loar - 1995 - Philosophical Issues 6:53-72.
Can Hegel Refer to Particulars?Katharina Dulckeit - 1986 - The Owl of Minerva 17 (2):181-194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-18

Downloads
89 (#191,487)

6 months
22 (#122,595)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrea Onofri
Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí

Citations of this work

Private Investigators and Public Speakers.Alexander Sandgren - 2023 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 9 (1):95-113.
Luck and the Value of Communication.Megan Hyska - 2023 - Synthese 201 (96):1-19.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The meaning of 'meaning'.Hilary Putnam - 1975 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7:131-193.
Individualism and the mental.Tyler Burge - 1979 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4 (1):73-122.
The components of content.David Chalmers - 2002 - In David J. Chalmers (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oxford University Press.

View all 45 references / Add more references