Personally perceived publication pressure: revising the Publication Pressure Questionnaire by using work stress models
Research Integrity and Peer Review 4 (1) (2019)
AbstractBackgroundThe emphasis on impact factors and the quantity of publications intensifies competition between researchers. This competition was traditionally considered an incentive to produce high-quality work, but there are unwanted side-effects of this competition like publication pressure. To measure the effect of publication pressure on researchers, the Publication Pressure Questionnaire was developed. Upon using the PPQ, some issues came to light that motivated a revision.MethodWe constructed two new subscales based on work stress models using the facet method. We administered the revised PPQ to a convenience sample together with the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the Work Design Questionnaire. To assess which items best measured publication pressure, we carried out a principal component analysis. Reliability was sufficient when Cronbach’s alpha > 0.7. Finally, we administered the PPQr in a larger, independent sample of researchers to check the reliability of the revised version.ResultsThree components were identified as ‘stress’, ‘attitude’, and ‘resources’. We selected 3 × 6 = 18 items with high loadings in the three-component solution. Based on the convenience sample, Cronbach’s alphas were 0.83 for stress, 0.80 for attitude, and 0.76 for resources. We checked the validity of the PPQr by inspecting the correlations with the MBI and the WDQ. Stress correlated 0.62 with MBI’s emotional exhaustion. Resources correlated 0.50 with relevant WDQ subscales. To assess the internal structure of the PPQr in the independent reliability sample, we conducted the principal component analysis. The three-component solution explains 50% of the variance. Cronbach’s alphas were 0.80, 0.78, and 0.75 for stress, attitude, and resources, respectively.ConclusionWe conclude that the PPQr is a valid and reliable instrument to measure publication pressure in academic researchers from all disciplinary fields. The PPQr strongly relates to burnout and could also be beneficial for policy makers and research institutions to assess the degree of publication pressure in their institute.
Similar books and articles
Revalidation of the Perceptions of Conscience Questionnaire (PCQ) and the Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ).J. Ahlin, E. Ericson-Lidman, A. Norberg & G. Strandberg - 2012 - Nursing Ethics 19 (2):220-232.
Volume Delivered During Recruitment Maneuver Predicts Lung Stress in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Beitler Jr, R. Majumdar, R. D. Hubmayr, A. Malhotra, B. T. Thompson, R. L. Owens, S. H. Loring & D. Talmor - unknown
Development and Initial Validation of the Stress of Conscience Questionnaire.Ann-Louise Glasberg, Sture Eriksson, Vera Dahlqvist, Elisabeth Lindahl, Gunilla Strandberg, Anna Söderberg, Venke Sørlie & Astrid Norberg - 2006 - Nursing Ethics 13 (6):633-648.
Academic Publications in the Age of Post-Enlightenment.Friedrich Krotz - 2013 - Communications 38 (1):1-12.
Swift Vs. Mainwaring: The Examiner and the Medley.Frank H. Ellis (ed.) - 1985 - Oxford University Press UK.
Scientific Dishonesty—a Nationwide Survey of Doctoral Students in Norway.Bjørn Hofmann, Anne Ingeborg Myhr & Søren Holm - 2013 - BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):3-.
The Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey: Validation Across Different Occupational Groups in Poland.Pawel Kleka & Teresa Chirkowska-Smolak - 2011 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 42 (2):86-94.
Development and Validation of Islamic Questionnaire of Spiritual Intelligence.Sareh Dermanaki Farahani, Faramarz Sohrabi & Masoud Azarbayejani - 2016 - Health, Spirituality and Medical Ethics 3 (3):4-11.
Ethical Pressure, Organizational-Professional Conflict, and Related Work Outcomes Among Management Accountants.William E. Shafer - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 38 (3):263 - 275.
Validity and Reliability of a Turkish Version of the Modified Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire for Student Nurses.Sibel Yilmaz Sahin, Emine Iyigun & Cengizhan Acikel - 2015 - Ethics and Behavior 25 (4):351-359.
Can Authorship be Denied for Contract Work?Livia Puljak & Dario Sambunjak - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (2):1031-1037.
Proposed Codification of Ethicacy in the Publication Process.Jo Ann Carland, James W. Carland & Carroll D. Aby - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):95 - 104.
Point-Defect Concentrations in B2 NiAl Alloys Under Pressure.G. Erdélyi, Cs Guthy & D. Beke - 2003 - Philosophical Magazine 83 (1):109-123.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Publish or Be Ethical? Publishing Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Research.Mariola Paruzel-Czachura, Lidia Baran & Zbigniew Spendel - 2020 - Research Ethics 17 (3):375-397.
Explaining Variance in Perceived Research Misbehavior: Results From a Survey Among Academic Researchers in Amsterdam.Frans Oort, Lex Bouter, Brian Martinson, Joeri Tijdink & Tamarinde Haven - 2021 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 6 (1).
Perceived Publication Pressure and Research Misconduct: Should We Be Too Bothered with a Causal Relationship?Nicole Shu Ling Yeo-Teh & Bor Luen Tang - 2022 - Research Ethics 18 (4):329-338.
Burnout Profiles Among Young Researchers: A Latent Profile Analysis.Anke Boone, Tinne Vander Elst, Sofie Vandenbroeck & Lode Godderis - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
References found in this work
No references found.