Craig, Mackie, and the Kalam Cosmological Argument

Religious Studies 27 (2):189 - 197 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In ‘Professor Mackie and the Kalam Cosmological Argument’ , 367–75), Professor William Lane Craig undertakes to demonstrate that J. L. Mackie's analysis of the kalam cosmological argument in The Miracle of Theism is ‘superficial’, and that Mackie ‘has failed to provide any compelling or even intuitively appealing objection against the argument’ . I disagree with Craig's judgement; for it seems to me that the considerations which Mackie advances do serve to refute the kalam cosmological argument. Consequently, the purpose of this paper is to reply to Craig's criticisms on Mackie's behalf

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

719 (#11,575)

6 months
87 (#8,598)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Oppy
Monash University

Citations of this work

The End of Eternity.Jamie Watson - 2017 - Sophia 56 (2):147-162.
Cosmological Arguments From Contingency.Joshua Rasmussen - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (9):806-819.
Graham Oppy on the Kalam Cosmological Argument.William Lane Craig - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (3):303-330.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references