Maydole’s Modal Perfection Argument (Again)

Philo 10 (1):72-84 (2007)
Abstract
In “On Oppy’s Objections to the Modal Perfection Argument,” Philo 8, 2, 2005, 123–30, Robert Maydole argues that his modal perfection argument—set out in his “The Modal Perfection Argument for a Supreme Being,” Philo 6, 2, 2003, 299–313—“remains arguably sound” in the face of the criticisms that I made of this argument in my “Maydole’s 2QS5 Argument,” Philo 7, 2, 2004, 203–11. I reply that Maydole is wrong: his argument is fatally flawed, and his attempts to avoid the criticisms that I have made of his argument are to no avail.
Keywords Maydole  ontological argument  higher order ontological argument  modal ontological argument  modal perfection  theism  God
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/philo20071018
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,613
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Pruss's Ontological Arguments.Graham Oppy - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (3):355-363.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-21

Total downloads

121 ( #40,159 of 2,168,944 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

9 ( #35,221 of 2,168,944 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums