Maydole on Ontological Arguments

In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 445 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is an assessment of Robert Maydole's work on ontological arguments. (Bibliographical details are provided in the text.) I argue that Maydole's ontological arguments are unsuccessful.

Categories

Keywords

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Higher-order ontological arguments.Graham Oppy - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1066-1078.
Ontological Arguments Redux.Robert E. Maydole - 2012 - In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 50--469.
Response to Maydole.Graham Oppy - 2012 - In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Bydgoszcz: Ontos Verlag. pp. 445-68.
Maydole’s 2QS5 Argument.Graham Oppy - 2004 - Philo 7 (2):203-211.
Pruss's ontological arguments.Graham Oppy - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (3):355-363.
8 Debate Maydole-Oppy.Miroslaw Szatkowski - 2012 - In Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 55.
On Grim's Cantorian Anti-Ontological Argument.Robert E. Maydole - 2012 - In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 50--367.
On the impossibility of successful ontological arguments.Paul Franceschi - 2002
The Ontological Argument.Robert E. Maydole - 2009 - In William Lane Craig & J. P. Moreland (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 553–592.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-29

Downloads
164 (#92,153)

6 months
31 (#66,188)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Oppy
Monash University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references