Maydole's 2QS5 Argument

Philo 7 (2):203-211 (2004)
This paper is a reply to Robert Maydole’s “The Modal Perfection Argument for the Existence of a Supreme Being,” published in Philo 6, 2, 2003. I argue that Maydole’s Modal Perfection Argument fails, and that there is no evident way in which it can be repaired.
Keywords ontological argument  modal perfection  God  theism  Maydole  existence of God  argument for existence of God  higher-order ontological argument  modal ontological argument
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/philo20047217
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Pruss's Ontological Arguments.Graham Oppy - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (3):355-363.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

87 ( #60,607 of 2,178,178 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

30 ( #9,485 of 2,178,178 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums