In Jonathan L. Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion Volume 3. Oxford University Press (2011)

Authors
Graham Oppy
Monash University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords O'Connor  Contingency  Fine-Tuning  Cosmological Arguments  Arguments for Design  Scotus
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

O'Connor's Cosmological Argument.Graham Oppy - 2011 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion: Vol. 3 3 (1):166.
Cosmological Arguments.Graham Oppy - 2009 - Noûs 43 (1):31-48.
Merely Possible Explanation.Ghislain Guigon - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (3):359-370.
Graham Oppy on the Kalam Cosmological Argument.William Lane Craig - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (3):303-330.
Craig, Mackie, and the Kalam Cosmological Argument.Graham Oppy - 1991 - Religious Studies 27 (2):189 - 197.
Explanation and the Cosmological Argument.Bruce Reichenbach - 2004 - In Michael Peterson & Raymond vanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. London: Blackwell. pp. 97-114.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-05-25

Total views
9 ( #899,632 of 2,421,806 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #76,734 of 2,421,806 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes