On Rescher on Pascal's Wager

Abstract
In Pascal's Wager: A Study Of Practical Reasoning In Philosophical Theology ,[1] Nicholas Rescher aims to show that, contrary to received philosophical opinion, Pascal's Wager argument is "the vehicle of a fruitful and valuable insight--one which not only represents a milestone in the development of an historically important tradition of thought but can still be seen as making an instructive contribution to philosophical theology".[2] In particular, Rescher argues that one only needs to adopt a correct perspective in order to see that Pascal's Wager argument is a good argument. Moreover, there seems to be a certain amount of contemporary support for Rescher's claim that Pascal's Wager argument can be seen to be a good argument when properly construed .[3] However, despite this recent trend to adopt a more sympathetic stance towards Pascal's Wager argument, I propose to defend the traditional view that Pascal's Wager argument is almost entirely worthless--at least from the theological standpoint. (No doubt, it has historical significance from the standpoint of decision theory; but that's a separate matter.).
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00161636
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,685
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Epistemology of the Book of Revelation.Jon Kenneth Newton - 2013 - Heythrop Journal 54 (5):n/a-n/a.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Pascal's Wager and the Nature of God.Greg Janzen - 2011 - Sophia 50 (3):331-344.
The Insufficiency of the Many Gods Objection to Pascal's Wager.Virgil Martin Nemoianu - 2010 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (3):513-530.
Pascal's Wager is a Possible Bet (but Not a Very Good One): Reply to Harmon Holcomb III.Graham Oppy - 1996 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40 (2):101 - 116.
Pascal's First Wager Reconsidered.Christopher Toner - 2006 - International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1):75-90.
Pascal's Wager.Alan Hájek - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

100 ( #49,942 of 2,158,312 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #133,350 of 2,158,312 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums