On the logic of the ontological argument

Philosophical Perspectives 5:509-529 (1991)
Abstract
In this paper, the authors show that there is a reading of St. Anselm's ontological argument in Proslogium II that is logically valid (the premises entail the conclusion). This reading takes Anselm's use of the definite description "that than which nothing greater can be conceived" seriously. Consider a first-order language and logic in which definite descriptions are genuine terms, and in which the quantified sentence "there is an x such that..." does not imply "x exists". Then, using an ordinary logic of descriptions and a connected greater-than relation, God's existence logically follows from the claims: (a) there is a conceivable thing than which nothing greater is conceivable, and (b) if <em>x</em> doesn't exist, something greater than x can be conceived. To deny the conclusion, one must deny one of the premises. However, the argument involves no modal inferences and, interestingly, Descartes' ontological argument can be derived from it.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2214107
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
On the PROVER9 Ontological Argument.T. Parent - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (2):475-483.
Incomplete Symbols — Definite Descriptions Revisited.Norbert Gratzl - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (5):489-506.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Millican on the Ontological Argument.Yujin Nagasawa - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):1027-1040.
Some Ontological Arguments.Hugh S. Chandler - 1993 - Faith and Philosophy 10 (1):18-32.
The Ontological Meta-Argument.Elijah Millgram - 2004 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):331-334.
O logice ontologického důkazu.Edward N. Zalta & Paul E. Oppenheimer - 2007 - Studia Neoaristotelica 4 (1):5-27.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
625 ( #2,272 of 2,193,091 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #9,870 of 2,193,091 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature