On the logic of the ontological argument

Philosophical Perspectives 5:509-529 (1991)

Authors
Paul Edward Oppenheimer
Stanford University
Edward Zalta
Stanford University
Abstract
In this paper, the authors show that there is a reading of St. Anselm's ontological argument in Proslogium II that is logically valid (the premises entail the conclusion). This reading takes Anselm's use of the definite description "that than which nothing greater can be conceived" seriously. Consider a first-order language and logic in which definite descriptions are genuine terms, and in which the quantified sentence "there is an x such that..." does not imply "x exists". Then, using an ordinary logic of descriptions and a connected greater-than relation, God's existence logically follows from the claims: (a) there is a conceivable thing than which nothing greater is conceivable, and (b) if <em>x</em> doesn't exist, something greater than x can be conceived. To deny the conclusion, one must deny one of the premises. However, the argument involves no modal inferences and, interestingly, Descartes' ontological argument can be derived from it.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2214107
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Totality of Predicates and the Possibility of the Most Real Being.Srećko Kovač - 2018 - Journal of Applied Logics - The IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications 5 (7):1523-1552.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Millican on the Ontological Argument.Yujin Nagasawa - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):1027-1040.
Some Ontological Arguments.Hugh S. Chandler - 1993 - Faith and Philosophy 10 (1):18-32.
The Ontological Meta-Argument.Elijah Millgram - 2004 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):331-334.
O logice ontologického důkazu.Edward N. Zalta & Paul E. Oppenheimer - 2007 - Studia Neoaristotelica 4 (1):5-27.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
820 ( #2,881 of 2,325,862 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
76 ( #5,965 of 2,325,862 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature