Paley's Argument for Design

Philo 5 (2):161-173 (2002)
Abstract
The main aim of this paper is to examine an almost universal assumption concerning the structure of Paley’s argument for design. Almost all commentators suppose that Paley’s argument is an inductive argument---either an argument by analogy or an argument by inference to the best explanation. I contend, on the contrary, that Paley’s argument is actually a straightforwardly deductive argument. Moreover, I argue that, when Paley’s argument is properly understood, it can readily be seen that it is no good. Finally---although I do not stress this very much---I note that the points that I make about Paley’s argument can carryover to modern design arguments that are based upon the argument that Paley actually gives
Keywords Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1098-3570  
DOI 10.5840/philo20025210
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Paley's Inductive Inference to Design.Jonah N. Schupbach - 2005 - Philosophia Christi 7 (2):491-502.
Hylomorphism and Design.John Kronen & Sandra Menssen - 2012 - Modern Schoolman 89 (3-4):155-180.
Teleology.Andre Ariew - 2007 - In David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge University Press.
Intelligent Design: The Original Version.Francisco J. Ayala - 2003 - Theology and Science 1 (1):9-32.
Paley's Design Argument as an Inference to the Best Explanation, or, Dawkins' Dilemma.S. Gliboff - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 31 (4):579-597.
How Not to Detect Design. [REVIEW]Branden Fitelson - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):472 - 488.
How Not to Detect Design. [REVIEW]Elliott Sober - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):472 - 488.
Design and its Discontents.Bruce H. Weber - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):271 - 289.
Paley’s Argument Revisited: Reply to Schupbach.Graham Oppy - 2008 - Philosophia Christi 10 (2):443-450.
Structural Flaws: Massive Modularity and the Argument From Design.Armin W. Schulz - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):733-743.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-01-09

Total downloads

142 ( #33,514 of 2,171,804 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

75 ( #2,137 of 2,171,804 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums