Philo 5 (2):161-173 (2002)
The main aim of this paper is to examine an almost universal assumption concerning the structure of Paley’s argument for design. Almost all commentators suppose that Paley’s argument is an inductive argument---either an argument by analogy or an argument by inference to the best explanation. I contend, on the contrary, that Paley’s argument is actually a straightforwardly deductive argument. Moreover, I argue that, when Paley’s argument is properly understood, it can readily be seen that it is no good. Finally---although I do not stress this very much---I note that the points that I make about Paley’s argument can carryover to modern design arguments that are based upon the argument that Paley actually gives
|Keywords||Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paley's Inductive Inference to Design.Jonah N. Schupbach - 2005 - Philosophia Christi 7 (2):491-502.
Paley's Teleological Argument and Its Significance.Bill Spencer - 2006 - Dialogue 48 (2-3):62 - 65.
Paley's Ipod: The Cognitive Basis of the Design Argument Within Natural Theology.Helen de Cruz & Johan de Smedt - 2010 - Zygon 45 (3):665-684.
Teleology.Andre Ariew - 2007 - In David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge University Press.
Intelligent Design: The Original Version.Francisco J. Ayala - 2003 - Theology and Science 1 (1):9-32.
Paley's Design Argument as an Inference to the Best Explanation, or, Dawkins' Dilemma.S. Gliboff - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 31 (4):579-597.
Paley’s Argument Revisited: Reply to Schupbach.Graham Oppy - 2008 - Philosophia Christi 10 (2):443-450.
Consciousness: The Achilles Heel of Darwinism? Thank God, Not Quite.Nicholas Humphrey - 2006 - In John Brockman (ed.), Intelligent Thought: Science Versus the Intelligent Design Movement. Vintage.
Structural Flaws: Massive Modularity and the Argument From Design.Armin W. Schulz - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):733-743.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads142 ( #33,514 of 2,171,804 )
Recent downloads (6 months)75 ( #2,137 of 2,171,804 )
How can I increase my downloads?