Response to Gettings

Analysis 60 (4):363-367 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is a reply to Michael Gettings' criticisms of a previous paper of mine on Godel's ontological argument. (All relevant bibliographical details may be found in the article.) I provide a patch to my previous -- faulty -- attempt to provide a parody of Godel's ontological argument on the model of Gaunilo's parody of Anselm's Proslogion 2 argument.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
583 (#50,497)

6 months
92 (#71,273)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Oppy
Monash University

Citations of this work

Ontological arguments.Graham Oppy - 2014 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A gödelian ontological argument improved.Alexander R. Pruss - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (3):347-353.
Maydole’s 2QS5 Argument.Graham Oppy - 2004 - Philo 7 (2):203-211.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Facts of Causation.D. H. Mellor - 1995 - Mind 107 (428):855-875.
The Facts of Causation.I. Hinkfuss & D. H. Mellor - 1997 - Philosophical Books 38 (1):1-11.
The Facts of Causation.D. H. Mellor - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 48 (193):550-552.
Some Emendations of Gödel's Ontological Proof.C. Anthony Anderson - 1990 - Faith and Philosophy 7 (3):291-303.
Godelian ontological arguments.G. Oppy - 1996 - Analysis 56 (4):226-230.

View all 9 references / Add more references