Authors
Imge Oranli
Arizona State University
Abstract
In Nicomachean Ethics VII Aristotle describes akrasia as a disposition. Taking into account that it is a disposition, I argue that akrasia cannot be understood on an epistemological basis alone, i.e., it is not merely a problem of knowledge that the akratic person acts the ways he does, but rather one is akratic due to a certain kind of habituation, where the person is not able to activate the potential knowledge s/he possesses. To stress this point, I focus on the gap between potential knowledge and its activation, whereby I argue that the distinction between potential and actual knowledge is at the center of the problem of akrasia. I suggest that to elaborate on this gap, we must go beyond the limits of Nicomachean Ethics to Metaphysics IX, where we find Aristotle’s discussion of the distinction between potentiality and actuality. I further analyze the gap between potential and actual knowledge by means of Aristotle’s discussion of practical syllogism, where I argue that akrasia is a result of a conflict in practical reasoning. I conclude my paper by stressing that for the akratic person the action is determined with respect to the conclusion of the practical syllogism, where the conclusion is produced by means of a ‘conflict’ between the universal opinion which is potential and the particular opinion which is appetitive.
Keywords Conference Proceedings  Aristotle  Akrasia  Disposition  Practical Syllogism  Potential Knowledge
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 978-1-63435-038-9
DOI 10.5840/wcp232018221312
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Practical Syllogism and Akrasia.Dennis Mckerlie - 1991 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):299 - 321.
Aristotle on the Akratic's Knowledge.Filip Grgić - 2002 - Phronesis 47 (4):336-358.
Aristotle on Pleasure and the Worst Form of Akrasia.Devin Henry - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (3):255-270.
Aristotle on Akrasia and Knowledge.Alfred R. Mele - 1981 - Modern Schoolman 58 (3):137-157.
Akratic Ignorance and Endoxic Inquiry.David N. McNeill - 2018 - Review of Metaphysics 72 (2).
The Will as Practical Reason and the Problem of Akrasia.Daniel Guevara - 2009 - Review of Metaphysics 62 (3):525-550.
Weakness of Will in Aristotle’s Ethics.Theodore Scaltsas - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (3):375-382.
Akrasia and Conflict in the Nicomachean Ethics.Mehmet Metin Erginel - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (4):573-593.
Akratic Believing, Psychological Trauma, and Somatic Representations.Karyn L. Freedman - 2017 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 24 (4):337-346.
Akrasia and Perceptual Illusion.Jessica Moss - 2009 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (2):119-156.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-05-08

Total views
80 ( #143,278 of 2,498,790 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #34,861 of 2,498,790 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes