A Note on Analysis and Circular Definitions

Grazer Philosophische Studien 54:107-113 (1998)
Authors
Abstract
Analyses, in the simplest form assertions that aim to capture an intimate link between two concepts, are viewed since Russell's theory of definite descriptions as analyzing descriptions. Analysis therefore has to obey the laws governing definitions including some form of a Substitutivity Principle. Once is accepted the road to the paradox of analysis is open. Popular reactions to the paradox involve the fundamental assumption that sentences differing only in containing an analysandum resp. an analysans express the same proposition, because analysandum and analysans are the same entity. Following suggestions of Gupta and Belnap it is argued that should be rejected.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI gps19985428
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 36,586
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Note on Analysis and Circular Definitions.Francesco Orilia & Achille C. Varzi - 1998 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 54:107-113.
A Semantic Resolution of the Paradox of Analysis.Dennis Earl - 2007 - Acta Analytica 22 (3):189-205.
A Fregean Solution to the Paradox of Analysis.Dale Jacquette - 1990 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 37:59-73.
A Fregean Solution to the Paradox of Analysis.Dale Jacquette - 1990 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 37:59-73.
Meaning and Circular Definitions.Francesco Orilia - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (2):155-169.
The Paradox of Analysis.Jeffrey Lamont Cobb - 1987 - Dissertation, Brown University
Moore's Paradox of Analysis.C. Mason Myers - 1971 - Metaphilosophy 2 (4):295–308.
Finite Circular Definitions.Anil Gupta - 2006 - In Thomas Bolander, Vincent F. Hendricks & Stig Andur Andersen (eds.), Self-Reference. CSLI Publications. pp. 79-93.
The Paradox of Belief Instability and a Revision Theory of Belief.Byeong Lee - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (4):314–328.
When is Circularity in Definitions Benign?J. A. Burgess - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):214–233.
Vague Analysis.Dennis Earl - 2010 - Metaphysica 11 (2):223-233.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-17

Total downloads
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature