Will biomedical enhancements undermine solidarity, responsibility, equality and autonomy?

Bioethics 25 (4):177-184 (2011)
Authors
Ori Lev
London School of Economics
Abstract
Prominent thinkers such as Jurgen Habermas and Michael Sandel are warning that biomedical enhancements will undermine fundamental political values. Yet whether biomedical enhancements will undermine such values depends on how biomedical enhancements will function, how they will be administered and to whom. Since only few enhancements are obtainable, it is difficult to tell whether these predictions are sound. Nevertheless, such warnings are extremely valuable. As a society we must, at the very least, be aware of developments that could have harmful consequences. Indeed, if important values were to be jeopardized, we should take appropriate measures to protect them. This paper focuses on four central values: solidarity, personal responsibility, equality and autonomy. It delineates the conditions under which biomedical enhancements would undermine these values. It also details the circumstances under which these values would be unaffected by enhancements as well as those under which they would be promoted. Specifying these conditions is valuable; it would enable society to prepare appropriate ethical guidelines and policy responses in advance
Keywords biomedical enhancement  equality  responsibility  solidarity  scenario planning  political values  autonomy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01779.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,134
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Human Freedom and Enhancement.Jan-Christoph Heilinger & Katja Crone - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (1):13-21.
Enhancing the Capacity for Moral Agency.Ori Lev - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 3 (4):20-22.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Are 'Ex Ante' Enhancements Always Permissible?S. Matthew Liao - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):23 – 25.
Regulating Biomedical Enhancements in the Military.Richard Edmund Ashcroft - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (2):47 – 49.
Are “Genetic Enhancements” Really Enhancements?Darren Shickle - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (3):342-352.
Enhancement and the Ethics of Development.Allen Buchanan - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (1):pp. 1-34.
The Ethics of Research on Enhancement Interventions.Lev Ori, G. Miller Franklin & J. Emanuel Ezekiel - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (2):101-113.
One Danger of Biomedical Enhancements.Alex Rajczi - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (6):328–336.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-12-01

Total downloads
64 ( #104,733 of 2,308,399 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #291,341 of 2,308,399 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature