Does firm size comfound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance?

Journal of Business Ethics 33 (2):167 - 180 (2001)

Abstract
There has been some theoretical and empirical debate that the positive relationship between corporate social performance (CSP) and firm financial performance (FFP) is spurious and in fact caused by a third factor, namely large firm size. This study examines this question by integrating three meta-analyses of more than two decades of research on (1) CSP and FFP, (2) firm size and CSP, and (3) firm size and FFP into one path-analytic model. The present study does not confirm size as a third factor which would confound the relationship between CSP and FFP. That is, even if firm size is controlled for across studies (comprising, on average, over 15 000 observations), CSP and FFP remain positively correlated, showing a "true-score" corrected path coefficient p of 0.37.
Keywords confounding variable  corporate social performance  firm financial performance  firm size  measurement error  meta-analysis  path analysis  reliability coefficient  sampling error  study artifacts
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1017516826427
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,131
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 28 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
67 ( #112,783 of 2,237,097 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #593,590 of 2,237,097 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature