Authors
Nico Orlandi
University of California, Santa Cruz
Abstract
This paper questions two prima facie plausible claims concerning switching in the presence of ambiguous figures. The first is the claim that reversing is an instantaneous process. The second is the claim that the ability to reverse demonstrates the interpretive, inferential and constructive nature of visual processing. Empirical studies show that optical and cerebral events related to switching protract in time in a way that clashes with its perceived instantaneity. The studies further suggest an alternative theory of reversing: according to such alternative, seeing the same thing in multiple ways is a matter of uncovering what is already present to the senses through visual search
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s13164-012-0098-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Action in Perception.Alva Noë - 2005 - MIT Press.
The Logic Of Perception.Irvin Rock - 1983 - Cambridge: MIT Press.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Admissible Contents of Visual Experience.Michael Tye - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (236):541-562.
Change Blindness and Time to Consciousness.Michael Niedeggen, Petra Wichmann & Petra Stoerig - 2001 - European Journal of Neuroscience 14 (10):1719-1726.
Is the Visual World a Grand Illusion?Alva Noë - 2002 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 9 (5-6):1-12.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-12-04

Total views
674 ( #9,536 of 2,448,336 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #34,811 of 2,448,336 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes