Think 17 (50):101-112 (2018)

Authors
Francesco Orsi
University of Tartu
Abstract
Should positional sexual misconduct (sexual advances or interaction where one party is known, or should be known, to have a significant power over the other) be included in the list of morally forbidden behaviours? I explore benefits and costs of this moral reform with the help of J. S. Mill.
Keywords power asymmetry  sexual misconduct  John Stuart Mill  sexual harassment
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S147717561800026X
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sidgwick and the Morality of Purity.Francesco Orsi - 2012 - Revue d'Etudes Benthamiennes 10 (10).
John Stuart Mill on Health Care Reform.Sean Donaghue Johnston - 2011 - Social Philosophy Today 27:63-74.
John Stuart Mill on Health Care Reform.Sean Donaghue Johnston - 2011 - Social Philosophy Today 27:63-74.
Mill and Paternalism.Gregory Claeys - 2013 - Cambridge University Press.
Mill and the Subjection of Women.Julia Annas - 1977 - Philosophy 52 (200):179 - 194.
Mill, Political Economy, and Women's Work.Nancy J. Hirschmann - 2008 - American Political Science Review 102 (2):199-203.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-09-27

Total views
93 ( #107,281 of 2,411,641 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #40,894 of 2,411,641 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes