Abstract
Wittgenstein y Apel pretendieron definir el constitutivo formal del sujeto intérprete del lenguaje a partir de las propuestas de Frege o de Peirce, pero en ambos casos sus propuestas se acabaron volviendo paradójicas. Primero, Wittgenstein por no poder fundamentarlo ni de un modo crítico-transcendental a partir de una noción de “yo” metafísico ni de unos juegos del lenguaje en sí mismos conductistas que tampoco permiten remitirse a unos signos intérprete, al modo exigido por Frege. De todos modos, posteriormente, Apel habría propuesto evitar estas paradojas mediante una interpretación pragmático-transcendental del sujeto intérprete a partir de Peirce, aunque finalmente comprobaría como también se acabarían fomentando el mismo tipo de paradojas. Wittgenstein and Apel sought to define the formal constitutive of the language interpreter subject based on the Frege or Peirce proposals, but in both cases their proposals ended up becoming paradoxical. First, Wittgenstein for not being able to ground it in a critical-transcendental way based on a notion of metaphysical "I" nor on behavioral language games in themselves that also do not allow to refer to some interpreter signs, in the way demanded by Frege. Anyway, later, Apel would have proposed to avoid these paradoxes by means of a pragmatic-transcendental interpretation of the interpreting subject starting from Peirce, although finally it would prove how the same type of paradoxes would also be fostered.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.6018/daimon/352811
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,431
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Charles S. Peirce: From Pragmatism to Pragmaticism. [REVIEW]H. R. - 1982 - Review of Metaphysics 36 (1):155-157.
Karl-Otto Apel Y la crítica Del sentido.Gustavo Salerno - 2009 - Ideas Y Valores 58 (139):33-59.
Karl-Otto Apel and the Critique of Meaning.Gustavo Salerno - 2009 - Ideas Y Valores 58 (139):33-60.
Peirce's Arrow and Satzsystem: A Logical View for the Language-Game.Rafael Duarte Oliveira Venancio - 2013 - Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies 1 (5):265-273.
El sujeto en cuestión: Abordajes contemporáneos.Agustín Palmieri & Felipe Pereyra Rozas - 2015 - Estudios de Filosofía Práctica E Historia de Las Ideas 17 (2):82-86.
Frege and Wittgenstein's Tractatus.Irving M. Copi - 1976 - Philosophia 6 (3-4):447-461.
Sobre las condiciones de la comprension transcultural.Julián Marrades - 1996 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 11 (1):161-183.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-12-21

Total views
4 ( #1,191,935 of 2,371,819 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #557,530 of 2,371,819 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes