Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):143-150 (2008)
This paper discusses the historiography of the ‘two cultures’ controversy. C. P. Snow’s lament about the ‘two cultures’, literary and scientific, has inspired a wide range of comment—much of which begins by citing Snow and his thesis, before going on to discuss very different things. This paper focuses upon one strand of this commentary, the historical analysis of the controversy itself. A ‘historical’ analysis is defined here as one that resists the impulse to enter the argument on behalf of Snow or Leavis, to conceive of their argument in the terms that Snow defined, or to invoke their argument as a precursor to some contemporary issue. Instead, a historical interpretation registers distance between that day and this, takes the controversy itself as its object of study, and explores the tensions and associations that came to be packed into those now familiar terms. As the fiftieth anniversary of Snow’s Rede Lecture nears, this approach—rather than the repetition of clichés about the bridging of cultures—offers both analytical perspective on the controversy and interpretive possibilities for its examination.Keywords: Two cultures; Literature; Cultural politics; C. P. Snow; F. R. Leavis; 1960s
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Reluctant Technocrats: Science Promotion in the Neglect-of-Science Debate of 1916-1918.Anna-K. Mayer - 2005 - History of Science 43 (2):139-159.
CP Snow as Anti-Historian of British Science: Revisiting the Technocractic Moment, 1959-1964.David Edgerton - 2005 - History of Science 43 (2):187-208.
Science as a Weapon in Kulturkampfe in the United States During and After World War II.David Hollinger - 1995 - Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 86:440-454.
Introduction: Historicizing the Two Cultures.Theodore M. Porter - 2005 - History of Science 43 (2):109-114.
FR Leavis, Science, and the Abiding Crisis of Modern Civilization.Guy Ortolano - 2005 - History of Science 43 (2):161-185.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Der Zusammenhang Von Wissenschaftsphilosophie, Wissenschaftsgeschichte Und Wissenschaftssoziologie in der Theorie Thomas Kuhns.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 1991 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 22 (1):43-59.
Nationalism, Historiography, and the (Re)Construction of the Past.Claire Norton (ed.) - 2007 - New Academia.
Anthropology as Science and the Anthropology of Science and of Anthropology or Understanding and Explanation in the Social Sciences, Part II.I. C. Jarvie - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:745 - 763.
What Happened to the Historiography of Science?Renan Springer de Freitas - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (1):92-106.
Historical Truth, Historical Criticism, and Ideology: Chinese Historiography and Historical Culture From a New Comparative Perspective.Helwig Schmidt-Glintzer, Achim Mittag & Jörn Rüsen (eds.) - 2005 - Brill.
The Interrelations Between the Philosophy, History and Sociology of Science in Thomas Kuhn's Theory of Scientific Development.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (4):487-501.
Interpreting Cultures: Literature, Religion, and Human Sciences.Jonathan Locke Hart - 2006 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #346,751 of 2,152,226 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #119,603 of 2,152,226 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.