Human Action in Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, and William of Ockham

Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although Thomas, Scotus, and Ockham are all broadly Aristotelian, their different Aristotelian accounts reflect underlying disagreements in these three areas. These trends may represent a shift from an earlier to a later medieval intellectual culture, but they also reflect views that continued to exist in different schools. Thomists continued to exist alongside Scotists through the end of the eighteenth century, and Ockham’s views had a more varied but continued influence through the modern period. The different views of Thomas, Scotus, and Ockham are not only in themselves plausible attempts at understanding human action, but they formed the background to late medieval and early modern descriptions of human action.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,764

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Just Price.Joakim Sandberg - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.
Scotus and Ockham.Colin Connors - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:141-153.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-11

Downloads
112 (#144,303)

6 months
15 (#110,420)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas M. Osborne
University of St. Thomas, Texas

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references