Problematizing Disciplinarity, Transdisciplinary Problematics

Theory, Culture and Society 32 (5-6):3-35 (2015)

Abstract
This article situates current debates about transdisciplinarity within the deeper history of academic disciplinarity, in its difference from the notions of inter- and multi-disciplinarity. It offers a brief typology and history of established conceptions of transdisciplinarity within science and technology studies. It then goes on to raise the question of the conceptual structure of transdisciplinary generality in the humanities, with respect to the incorporation of the 19th- and 20th-century German and French philosophical traditions into the anglophone humanities, under the name of 'theory'. It identifies two distinct - dialectical and anti-dialectical, or dialectical and transversal - transdisciplinary trajectories. It locates the various contributions to the special issue of which it is the introduction within this conceptual field, drawing attention to the distinct contribution of the French debates about structuralism and its aftermath - those by Serres, Foucault, Derrida, Guattari and Latour, in particular. It concludes with an appendix on Foucault's place within current debates about disciplinarity and academic disciplines
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0263276415592245
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 41,608
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge.Paul Feyerabend - 1976 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (1):129-130.
Science in a Free Society.Paul Feyerabend - 1978 - Philosophical Quarterly 30 (119):172-174.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Gillian Rose and Marxism.P. Osborne - 2015 - Télos 2015 (173):55-67.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Philosophical Issues in Ethnophysiography: Landform Terms, Disciplinarity, and the Question of Method.Bruce Janz - 2011 - In David Mark, Andrew Turk, Niclas Burenhult & David Stea (eds.), Landscape in Language: Transdisciplinary Perspectives. John Benjamins Publishing. pp. 101-119.
The Disciplinarity of Knowledge at the Mathematics-Physics Interference.E. Livingston - 1993 - In Ellen Messer-Davidow, David R. Shumway & David Sylvan (eds.), Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity. University Press of Virginia.
Education and the Genesis of Disciplinarity: The Unexpected Reversal.Keith Hoskin - 1993 - In Ellen Messer-Davidow, David R. Shumway & David Sylvan (eds.), Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity. University Press of Virginia. pp. 271--304.
Modernisms and Mediations.Peter Osborne - 2009 - In Francis Halsall, Julia Jansen & Tony O'Connor (eds.), Rediscovering Aesthetics: Transdisciplinary Voices from Art History, Philosophy, and Art Practice. Stanford University Press.
On a Motivated Semiotic.Myrdene Anderson - 1986 - Semiotics:321-327.
A 'Limit Attitude': Foucault, Autonomy, Critique.Paul Healy - 2001 - History of the Human Sciences 14 (1):49-68.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-03

Total views
16 ( #503,988 of 2,249,323 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #483,691 of 2,249,323 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature