The misguided marriage of responsibility and autonomy

The Journal of Ethics 6 (3):261-280 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Much of the literature devoted to the topics of agent autonomy and agent responsibility suggests strong conceptual overlaps between the two, although few explore these overlaps explicitly. Beliefs of this sort are commonplace, but they mistakenly conflate the global state of being autonomous with the local condition of acting autonomously or exhibiting autonomy in respect to some act or decision. Because the latter, local phenomenon of autonomy seems closely tied to the condition of being responsible for an act, we tend to think of the former, global phenomenon as a condition of responsibility as well. But one can act autonomously, or manifest autonomy with respect to some occurrent state, without satisfying the conditions for autonomous agency. Autonomous agency and responsible agency are logically distinct in part due to the varient conceptions of rationality each calls for. Both agent responsibility and holding a person responsible imply a fairly ``thick'''' form of rationality, where rationality embodies a normative component and is a matter of satisfying criteria that are objective in the sense that they are independent of what a person happens to want or to value. But autonomous agency calls for a quite different, ``thin'''' conception of instrumental rationality.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Brute luck and responsibility.Peter Vallentyne - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (1):57-80.
Responsibility and False Beliefs.Peter Vallentyne - 2011 - In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Justice and Responsibility. Oxford University Press.
Extended cognition, personal responsibility, and relational autonomy.Mason Cash - 2010 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (4):645-671.
What’s So Bad about Self-Sacrifice?Kalynne Hackney Pudner - 2007 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:241-250.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
128 (#142,809)

6 months
16 (#158,534)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marina Oshana
University of California, Davis

Citations of this work

There Is No Techno-Responsibility Gap.Daniel W. Tigard - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (3):589-607.
Autonomy, Rationality, and Contemporary Bioethics.Jonathan Pugh - 2020 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
The objective stance and the boundary problem.Carla Bagnoli - 2021 - European Journal of Philosophy 29 (3):646-663.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Moral relativism defended.Gilbert Harman - 1975 - Philosophical Review 84 (1):3-22.
Culpable ignorance.Holly Smith - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (4):543-571.
The moral education theory of punishment.Jean Hampton - 1984 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (3):208-238.
Freedom in Belief and Desire.Philip Pettit & Michael Smith - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (9):429-449.

View all 8 references / Add more references