In Alexander Klein (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of William James (2019)

Authors
James O'Shea
University College Dublin
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Central to both James’s earlier psychology and his later philosophical views was a recurring distinction between percepts and concepts. The distinction evolved and remained fundamental to his thinking throughout his career as he sought to come to grips with its fundamental nature and significance. In this chapter, I focus initially on James’s early attempt to articulate the distinction in his 1885 article “The Function of Cognition.” This will highlight a key problem to which James continued to return throughout his later philosophical work on the nature of our cognition, including in his famous “radical empiricist” metaphysics of “pure experience” around the turn of the century. We shall find that James grappled insightfully but ambivalently with the perceptual and conceptual dimensions of the “knowledge relation” or the “cognitive relation,” as he called it—or what, following Franz Brentano, philosophers would later call our object-directed thought or intentionality more generally. Some philosophers have once again returned to James’s work for crucial insights on this pivotal topic, while others continue to find certain aspects of his account to be problematic. What is beyond dispute is that James’s inquiries in this domain were both innovative and of lasting significance.
Keywords percept  concept  intentionality  pure experience  radical empiricism  cognition  knowledge relation  William James  pragmatism  Sellars  the given
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Franz Brentano and William James.Fred Kersten - 1969 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 7 (2):177-191.
Pure Experience: The Response to William James.Eugene Taylor & Robert H. Wozniak - 1996 - In E. I. Taylor & R. H. Wozniak (eds.), Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. Bristol: Thoemmes Press. pp. 338-341.
William James on Emotion and Intentionality.Matthew Ratcliffe - 2005 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (2):179-202.
James and Whitehead: Assemblage and Systematization of a Deeply Empiricist Mosaic Phi-Losophy.Paul Stenner - 2011 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 3 (1):101-130.
Discovery as Seeing: Lessons From Radical Empiricism and Meditative Practice.Kaisa Puhakka - 1992 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 12 (1):48-58.
William James and the Metaphysics of Experience.Richard M. Gale - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):244-246.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-07-13

Total views
79 ( #131,188 of 2,433,406 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #26,292 of 2,433,406 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes