Some Medieval Readings of Aristotle’s Argument for the Collective Superiority of “the Many”

Studia Neoaristotelica 9 (2):135-153 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


An essential challenge of Aristotle’s Politics arises from the juxtaposition of contrasting and competing arguments in favour of virtuous monarchy, on the one hand, and the collective superiority of “the many”, on the other. This paper examines the purely theoretical reception of this contrast in the writings of some late medieval Aristotelians by focusing on a key section in Politics Γ (1280a8–1284b34). After reviewing Aristotle’s problematic position, the paper discusses its interpretation in the commentaries of Albert the Great, Thomas Aquinas/Peter of Auvergne and Walter Burley, as well as its use in the works of Giles of Rome, John of Paris and Marsilius of Padua. On that basis, finally, the paper outlines some general trends with regard to how medieval scholars dealt with Aristotle’s idea of the rule of the many as opposed to that of one or few virtuous persons.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Medieval Reception of Aristotle’s Passage on Natural Justice.José A. Poblete - 2020 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 94 (2):211-238.
Aristotle's Argument for Perfectionism.Eric J. Silverman - 2011-09-16 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 214–216.
The Reception and Interpretation of Aristotle's Politics.Jean Dunbabin - 1982 - In Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 728.


Added to PP

53 (#309,323)

6 months
9 (#355,272)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?