Droga ekonomii wolnej od wartościowania do epistemologicznej pychy. Użycie i nadużycie matematyki przez ekonomistów
Philosophical Problems in Science 67:153-202 (2019)
AbstractThe goal of the article is to substantiate that despite the criticism the paradigm in economics will not change because of the axiomatic assumptions of value-free economics. How these assumptions work is demonstrated on the example of Gary Becker’s economic approach which is analyzed from the perspective of scientific research programme. The author indicates hard core of economic approach and the protective belt which makes hard core immune from any criticism. This immunity leads economists to believe that they are objective scientists and, consequently, it results in epistemological hubris. Due to its tautological nature, economic approach is considered to be a degenerative programme. This conclusion is extended on value-free economics. In spite of these problems, many economists still believe in positive economics and they dismiss normative approaches. It has a negative influence on people. The conclusion of the article is that thanks to axiomatic assumptions economists do not have objective and ironclad methodology and they should accept normative values in their research.
Similar books and articles
Economic Behavior and Institutions: Principles of Neoinstitutional Economics.Thrainn Eggertsson - 1990 - Cambridge University Press.
Economics without Laws. Towards a New Philosophy of Economics.Łukasz Hardt - 2017 - Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
The Turn in Economics and the Turn in Economic Methodology: Past Chair Address: International Network for Economic Method Conference, Grinnell College, 22 June 2006. [REVIEW]John B. Davis - 2007 - Journal of Economic Methodology 14 (3):275-290.
Spiethoff's Economic Styles: a Pluralistic Approach?Sebastian Thieme - 2018 - Economic Thought 7 (1):1.
The reformation of economic thought dutch calvinist economics, 1880–1948.Joost W. Hengstmengel - 2013 - Philosophia Reformata 78 (2):124-143.
An Assessment of the Scientific Standing of Economics.Margaret Schabas - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:298 - 306.
Why economists should be unhappy with the economics of happiness.Pierluigi Barrotta - 2008 - Economics and Philosophy 24 (2):145-165.
The Recent Critique of Theoretical Economics: A Methodologically Informed Investigation.Lukasz Hardt - 2016 - Journal of Economic Issues 50 (1):269-287.
Toward a Better Understanding of the Positive/Normative Distinction in Economics.Samuel C. Weston - 1994 - Economics and Philosophy 10 (1):1-17.
Economics, Ethics and the Market: Introduction and Applications.J. J. Graafland - 2005 - Routledge.
Pisces Economicus: The Fish as Economic Man.Bryan L. Boulier - 1991 - Economics and Philosophy 7 (1):83-86.
The PPE enterprise: A substantive research programme.Alan Hamlin - 2010 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (4):366-378.
Rosenberg's “Lakatosian Consolations for Economists”: Comment.E. Roy Weintraub - 1987 - Economics and Philosophy 3 (1):139-142.
Critical Realism in Economics: Development and Debate.Steve Fleetwood (ed.) - 1999 - Routledge.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Eclipse of Value-Free Economics. The concept of multiple self versus homo economicus.Aleksander Ostapiuk - 2020 - Wrocław, Polska: Publishing House of Wroclaw University of Economics and Business.
Problem istoty i pomiaru dobrobytu.Wojciech Rybka - 2019 - Philosophical Problems in Science 67:203-248.
Value-free paradise is lost. Economists could learn from artists.Aleksander Ostapiuk - 2020 - Annales. Ethics in Economic Life 23 (4):7-33.
References found in this work
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.