AbstractThesis 1: The new does not arrive from some ‘other place’, but is produced from the very matter of the world, after all what else is there? And where else can the new come from? The new then involves a recombination of already existing elements in and of the world. The new would then be a repetition, but with difference. As such the new must be distinguished from fashion, which involves a repetition of the same, that is, does not really involve a radical recombination of elements. However, the new is not opposed to fashion, but rather accelerates certain of its operating logics, namely the production of difference. After all, there must be a certain amount of difference for fashion to be what it is. Fashion in this sense is the near enemy of art. Here is my first question: is it enough to affirm a recombination of matter in order to produce something new? For example, a new art? Would this not merely involve playing with that which is already here, already has reality as it were? Or, following Deleuze, would not such a recombination involve playing with that which is ‘possible’, the latter being a mirror-image or isotope of the real, in fact being the same, conceptually speaking, only lacking reality. Or to phrase this question in a slightly different manner: is there really such a difference between the new in art and the new in fashion? And if there is such a difference, as I think there is, then what else is needed to produce the new?
Similar books and articles
The Determination of Sense via Deleuze and Blanchot: Paradoxes of the Habitual, the Immemorial, and the Eternal Return.Eugene Brently Young - 2008 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 2 (2):155-177.
Fashion Seen as Something Imitative and Foreign.Nickolas Pappas - 2008 - British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (1):1-19.
Moscow on the fashion map: between periphery and centre.Djurdja Bartlett - 2011 - Studies in East European Thought 63 (2):111-121.
Marx as Ally: Deleuze outside Marxism, Adjacent Marx.Aldo Pardi - 2009 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 3 (Suppl):53-77.
Differentiating Derrida and Deleuze.Gordon C. F. Bearn - 2000 - Continental Philosophy Review 33 (4):441-465.
An Approach to Difference and Repetition.John Protevi - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 5 (11):35-43.
Events of Difference: The Fold in between Deleuze’s Reading of Leibniz.Keith Robinson - 2003 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (1):141-164.
On Post-Heideggerean Difference: Derrida and Deleuze.Daniel Colucciello Barber - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):113-129.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Ethics of Political Resistance: Althusser, Badiou, Deleuze.Henry Chris - 2019 - Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
References found in this work
Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia.Gilles Deleuze & Felix Guattari - 1977 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
The Two Sources of Morality and Religion. [REVIEW]I. E., Henri Bergson, R. Ashley Audra, Cloudesley Brereton & W. Horsfall Carter - 1935 - Journal of Philosophy 32 (14):387.
Art Encounters Deleuze and Guattari: Thought Beyond Representation.Simon O'Sullivan - 2006 - Palgrave-Macmillan.