Ratio 22 (1):41-58 (2009)

Authors
Michael Otsuka
London School of Economics
Abstract
A critical examination of Parfit's attempt to reconcile Kantian contractualism with consequentialism, which disputes his contention that the contracting parties would lack decisive reasons to choose principles that ground prohibitions against harming of the sort to which non-consequentialists have been attracted. 1.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2008.00417.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,676
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Parfit, Convergence, and Underdetermination.Marius Baumann - 2018 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 13 (3).
Kant-Bibliographie 2009.Margit Ruffing - 2011 - Kant-Studien 102 (4):499-540.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Demands of Consequentialism.Tim Mulgan - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
Virtue Ethics, Kantian Ethics, and Consequentialism.Jane Singleton - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:537-551.
Kantian Consequentialism.David Cummiskey - 1990 - Ethics 100 (3):586-615.
7 Consequentialism.Douglas W. Portmore - 2011 - In Christian Miller (ed.), Continuum Companion to Ethics. Continuum. pp. 143.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
128 ( #73,580 of 2,386,703 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,015 of 2,386,703 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes