The Kantian argument for consequentialism

Ratio 22 (1):41-58 (2009)
Abstract
A critical examination of Parfit's attempt to reconcile Kantian contractualism with consequentialism, which disputes his contention that the contracting parties would lack decisive reasons to choose principles that ground prohibitions against harming of the sort to which non-consequentialists have been attracted. 1.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2008.00417.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,564
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Demands of Consequentialism.Tim Mulgan - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
7 Consequentialism.Douglas W. Portmore - 2011 - In Christian Miller (ed.), Continuum Companion to Ethics. Continuum. pp. 143.
Kantian Consequentialism.David Cummiskey - 1990 - Ethics 100 (3):586-615.
Virtue Ethics, Kantian Ethics, and Consequentialism.Jane Singleton - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:537-551.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
112 ( #51,326 of 2,235,793 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #447,087 of 2,235,793 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature