The Kantian argument for consequentialism

Ratio 22 (1):41-58 (2009)
Authors
Michael Otsuka
London School of Economics
Abstract
A critical examination of Parfit's attempt to reconcile Kantian contractualism with consequentialism, which disputes his contention that the contracting parties would lack decisive reasons to choose principles that ground prohibitions against harming of the sort to which non-consequentialists have been attracted. 1.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2008.00417.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,562
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Demands of Consequentialism.Tim Mulgan - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
7 Consequentialism.Douglas W. Portmore - 2011 - In Christian Miller (ed.), Continuum Companion to Ethics. Continuum. pp. 143.
Kantian Consequentialism.David Cummiskey - 1990 - Ethics 100 (3):586-615.
Virtue Ethics, Kantian Ethics, and Consequentialism.Jane Singleton - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:537-551.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
115 ( #51,950 of 2,268,347 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #145,496 of 2,268,347 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature