Review of Fogelin, A Defense of Hume on Miracles [Book Review]
Hume Studies 30 (1):165-68 (2004)
AbstractWith A Defense of Hume on Miracles Robert Fogelin enters the recent discussion on Hume’s treatment of miracles. In this short book Fogelin begins by presenting his interpretation of Hume’s argument concerning miracles. The second chapter is a lengthy treatment of recent work by David Johnson and John Earman, and the third short chapter is a discussion of the relation of Hume’s view on miracles to his broader philosophy. There are also two appendices and the text of “Of Miracles.”.
Similar books and articles
Hume on miracles: Bayesian interpretation, multiple testimony, and the existence of God.Rodney D. Holder - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):49-65.
A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'.Chris Slupik - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
Review of Robert J. Fogelin, A Defense of Hume on Miracles, Princeton. [REVIEW]Terence Penelhum - 2004 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (1).
Review of: Hume, Holism, and Miracles; Hume's Abject Failure; A Defense of Hume on Miracles. [REVIEW]Michael Jacovides - 2008 - Philosophical Review 117 (1):142-147.
Mackie's treatment of miracles.Richard Otte - 1996 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 39 (3):151-158.
A Defence of Hume on Miracles - by Robert J. Fogelin. [REVIEW]J. C. A. Gaskin - 2007 - Philosophical Books 48 (2):166-168.
Hume’s Abject Failure: The Argument Against Miracles.John Earman - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads