Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (3):175-180 (2013)
Two principles form the basis for much priority setting in health. According to the greater benefit principle, resources should be directed toward the intervention with the greater health benefit. According to the worse off principle, resources should be directed toward the intervention benefiting those initially worse off. Jointly, these principles accord with so-called prioritarianism. Crucial for its operationalisation is the specification of the worse off. In this paper, we examine how the worse off can be defined as those with the fewer lifetime Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). We contrast this proposal with several alternative specifications
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Priority Setting in Low Income Countries: The Roles and Legitimacy of Development Assistance Partners.L. Kapiriri - 2012 - Public Health Ethics 5 (1):67-80.
Equality, Priority and Global Justice.Nils Holtug - 2009 - Journal of Global Ethics 5 (3):173 – 179.
Shaping Biomedical Research Priorities: The Case of the National Institutes of Health. [REVIEW]Daniel Callahan - 1999 - Health Care Analysis 7 (2):115-129.
Priority Setting and Evidence Based Purchasing.Lucy Frith - 1999 - Health Care Analysis 7 (2):139-151.
Priority Setting in Health Care: Lessons From the Experiences of Eight Countries.Lindsay M. Sabik & Reidar K. Lie - unknown
A Strategy to Improve Priority Setting in Health Care Institutions.Doug Martin & Peter Singer - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (1):59-68.
Added to index2012-12-01
Total downloads14 ( #329,858 of 2,158,821 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #193,365 of 2,158,821 )
How can I increase my downloads?