Propositional Attitudes in Modern Philosophy

Dialogue 41 (3):551-568 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophers of the modern period are often presented as having made an elementary error: that of confounding the attitude one adopts toward a proposition with its content. By examining the works of Locke and the Port-Royalians, I show that this accusation is ill-founded and that Locke, in particular, has the resources to construct a theory of propositional attitudes.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-25

Downloads
1,484 (#11,578)

6 months
174 (#23,564)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Walter Ott
University of Virginia

Citations of this work

Kant on Perceptual Content.Colin McLear - 2016 - Mind 125 (497):95-144.
Locke, Arnauld, and Abstract Ideas.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (1):75-94.
Arnauld's Verbal Distinction between Ideas and Perceptions.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2016 - History and Philosophy of Logic 37 (4):375-390.
Berkeley's Theory of Language.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2021 - In Samuel Charles Rickless, The Oxford Handbook of Berkeley. New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

An essay concerning human understanding.John Locke - 1689 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Pauline Phemister.
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (trans. Pears and McGuinness).Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1921 - New York,: Routledge. Edited by Luciano Bazzocchi & P. M. S. Hacker.
A System of Logic.John Stuart Mill - 1829/2002 - Longman.
The philosophical writings of Descartes.René Descartes - 1984 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tractatus logico-philosophicus.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1922 - Filosoficky Casopis 52:336-341.

View all 49 references / Add more references