Propositional Attitudes in Modern Philosophy
Dialogue 41 (3):551-568 (2002)
| Authors |
Walter Ott
University of Virginia
|
| Abstract |
Philosophers of the modern period are often presented as having made an elementary error: that of confounding the atttitude one adopts toward a proposition with its content. By examining the works of Locke and the Port-Royalians, I show that this accusation is ill-founded and that Locke, in particular, has the resources to construct a theory of propositional attitudes.
|
| Keywords | Arnauld assertion Kant Locke Port-Royal Mill judgment proposition unity of the proposition |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| ISBN(s) | 0012-2173 |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0012217300005266 |
| Options |
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- journals.cambridge.org (no proxy)
- journals.cambridge.org [2] (no proxy)
- mendeley.com
(no proxy) - cambridge.org (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1991 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant & Norman Kemp Smith - 1966 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26 (3):449-451.
View all 39 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Arnauld's Verbal Distinction Between Ideas and Perceptions.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2016 - History and Philosophy of Logic 37 (4):375-390.
Locke and Arnauld on Judgment and Proposition.Maria van der Schaar - 2008 - History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (4):327-341.
Berkeley's Theory of Language.Kenneth L. Pearce - forthcoming - In Samuel C. Rickless (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Berkeley. New York: Oxford University Press.
How Berkeley's Gardener Knows His Cherry Tree.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1):553-576.
View all 6 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Not All Attitudes Are Propositional.Alex Grzankowski - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy (3):374-391.
The Phenomenology of Propositional Attitudes.Sørenarnow H. Klausen - 2008 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (4).
Against Essential Normativity of the Mental.Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (2):263 - 283.
Propositional Attitudes in Fiction.John Zeimbekis - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (3):261-276.
The Aggregation of Propositional Attitudes: Towards a General Theory.Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2010 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology 3.
The Measure of Mind: Propositional Attitudes and Their Attribution.Robert J. Matthews - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Peculiar Perfection: Peter Abelard on Propositional Attitudes.Martin Lenz - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):377-386.
Davidson’s Theory of Propositional Attitudes.Richard Feldman - 1986 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (December):693-712.
Inside Doubt: On the Non-Identity of the Theory of Mind and Propositional Attitude Psychology. [REVIEW]David Landy - 2005 - Minds and Machines 15 (3-4):399-414.
Do Anti-Individualistic Construals of Propositional Attitudes Capture the Agent's Conception?Sanford C. Goldberg - 2002 - Noûs 36 (4):597-621.
Individuating Propositional Attitudes.Donald Brownstein - 1985 - Philosophical Topics 13 (2):205-212.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-09-25
Total views
604 ( #6,388 of 2,271,740 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
69 ( #9,884 of 2,271,740 )
2010-09-25
Total views
604 ( #6,388 of 2,271,740 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
69 ( #9,884 of 2,271,740 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
