Faith and Philosophy 10 (1):93-98 (1993)

Richard Otte
University of California, Santa Cruz
George Schlesinger has recently presented a reply to Hume’s argument concerning miracles. Schlesinger argues that probability theory and some simple assumptions about miracles show that testimony for a miracle increases the probability of God existing; furthermore this testimony can raise the probability of God existing enough that it is rational to believe that God exists. I argue that one of the assumptions that Schlesinger makes is false, and that the justification Schlesinger gives for it does not succeed. Thus I claim Schlesinger’s reply to Hume fails
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0739-7046
DOI 10.5840/faithphil199310130
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,308
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Weaker Condition for Transitivity in Probabilistic Support.William A. Roche - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):111-118.
A Condition for Transitivity in Probabilistic Support.Tomoji Shogenji - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (4):613-616.
Miracles.Michael Levine - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Credibility of Miracles.Ruth Weintraub - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 82 (3):359 - 375.
David Hume and the Probability of Miracles.George I. Mavrodes - 1998 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43 (3):167-182.
Miracles and Testimony.Keith Ward - 1985 - Religious Studies 21 (2):131 - 145.
A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'.Chris Slupik - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
Why Time is Extensive.Gilbert Plumer - 1984 - Mind 93 (370):265-270.
Need Miracles Be Extraordinary?Robert Hambourger - 1987 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (3):435-449.
Martin on Miracles.Michael Almeida - 2007 - Philo 10 (1):27-34.
Miracles, Evidence, and God.Robert Larmer - 2003 - Dialogue 42 (1):107-.
The Probability of the Simple Hypothesis.George Schlesinger - 1967 - American Philosophical Quarterly 4 (2):152 - 158.


Added to PP index

Total views
36 ( #263,633 of 2,326,038 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #650,227 of 2,326,038 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes