Can Nature be Evil?

Environmental Ethics 21 (2):135-150 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Holmes Rolston, III’s analysis of disvalue in nature is the sole explicit and sustained discussion of the negative side of nature by an environmental philosopher. Given Rolston’s theological background, perhaps it is not surprising that his analysis has strong analogues with traditional theodicies, which attempt to account for evil in a world created by a good God. In this paper, I explore those analogues and use them to help evaluate Rolston’s account. Ultimately, I find it more satisfactory than traditional theodicy in its own context, but I also raise two problems: a weighting and a counseling problem. First, once Rolston acknowledges the reality and role of disvalue in nature, he discounts its significance too greatly. Second, his account is less useful in helping those who have been harmed by the destructive activity of nature. I claim that we can usefully regard Rolston’s analysis as a deconstruction of the anthropocentric, non-ecological view of nature. Finally, I argue that the two problems and a related issue, the objectivity/subjectivity of values, point in the direction of a pragmatist account of value in nature.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,102

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ideas of nature in an asian context.Michael G. Barnhart - 1997 - Philosophy East and West 47 (3):417-432.
Naturalizing the Problem of Evil.Jim Cheney - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (3):299-313.
Rolston on intrinsic value: A deconstruction.J. Baird Callicott - 1992 - Environmental Ethics 14 (2):129-143.
Following human nature.Nathan Kowalsky - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (2):165-183.
Rolston's Theory of Value.Katie McShane - 2007 - In Christopher J. Preston and Wayne Ouderkirk (ed.), Nature, Value, Duty: Life on Earth with Holmes Rolston, III. Springer.
Rolston, Lonergan, and the Intrinsic Value of Nature.Theodore W. Nunez - 1999 - Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1):105 - 128.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
20 (#689,043)

6 months
2 (#889,309)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Book Review. [REVIEW]Hicham-Stephane Afeissa - 2009 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (1):89-95.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references