Can nature be evil?: Rolston, disvalue, and theodicy

Environmental Ethics 21 (2):135-150 (1999)
Abstract
Holmes Rolston, III’s analysis of disvalue in nature is the sole explicit and sustained discussion of the negative side of nature by an environmental philosopher. Given Rolston’s theological background, perhaps it is not surprising that his analysis has strong analogues with traditional theodicies, which attempt to account for evil in a world created by a good God. In this paper, I explore those analogues and use them to help evaluate Rolston’s account. Ultimately, I find it more satisfactory than traditional theodicy in its own context, but I also raise two problems: a weighting and a counseling problem. First, once Rolston acknowledges the reality and role of disvalue in nature, he discounts its significance too greatly. Second, his account is less useful in helping those who have been harmed by the destructive activity of nature. I claim that we can usefully regard Rolston’s analysis as a deconstruction of the anthropocentric, non-ecological view of nature. Finally, I argue that the two problems and a related issue, the objectivity/subjectivity of values, point in the direction of a pragmatist account of value in nature
Keywords Applied Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0163-4275
DOI 10.5840/enviroethics199921227
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,157
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Ideas of Nature in an Asian Context.Michael G. Barnhart - 1997 - Philosophy East and West 47 (3):417-432.
Against Rolston's Defense of Eating Animals.John Mizzoni - 2002 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):125-131.
Rolston, Lonergan, and the Intrinsic Value of Nature.Theodore W. Nunez - 1999 - Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1):105 - 128.
Rolston's Theory of Value.Katie McShane - 2007 - In Christopher J. Preston and Wayne Ouderkirk (ed.), Nature, Value, Duty: Life on Earth with Holmes Rolston, III. Springer.
Following Human Nature.Nathan Kowalsky - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (2):165-183.
Rolston on Intrinsic Value: A Deconstruction.J. Baird Callicot - 1992 - Environmental Ethics 14 (2):129-143.
Naturalizing the Problem of Evil.Jim Cheney - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (3):299-313.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

11 ( #400,422 of 2,163,617 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,037 of 2,163,617 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums