How to analyze immediate experience: Hintikka, Husserl, and the idea of phenomenology

Metaphilosophy 39 (3):282-304 (2008)

This article discusses Jaakko Hintikka's interpretation of the aims and method of Husserl's phenomenology. I argue that Hintikka misrepresents Husserl's phenomenology on certain crucial points. More specifically, Hintikka misconstrues Husserl's notion of "immediate experience" and consequently fails to grasp the functions of the central methodological tools known as the "epoché" and the "phenomenological reduction." The result is that the conception of phenomenology he attributes to Husserl is very far from realizing the philosophical potential of Husserl's position. Hence if we want a fruitful rapprochement between analytical philosophy and Continental phenomenology of the kind that is Hintikka's ultimate aim, then Hintikka's account of Husserl needs correcting on a number of crucial points.
Keywords philosophical method  Hintikka  Husserl  epoché  phenomenology  immediate experience
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2008.00543.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 48,857
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Phenomenology of Perception.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1962 - Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: The Humanities Press.
Introduction to Phenomenology.Robert Sokolowski - 1999 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Royaumont Revisited.Søren Overgaard - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (5):899-924.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
132 ( #65,342 of 2,309,424 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #104,842 of 2,309,424 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature