Life Enhancement Technologies And the Significance of Social Category Membership

In Julian Savulescu & Nick Bostrom (eds.), Human Enhancement. Oxford University Press (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Life Enhancement Technologies: Significance of Social Category Membership.Christine Overall - 2009 - In Julian Savulescu & Nick Bostrom (eds.), Human Enhancement. Oxford University Press.
Life Enhancement Technologies: Significance of Social Category Membership.Christine Overall - 2009 - In Nick Bostrom & Julian Savulesu (eds.), Human Enhancement. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 327-340.
Enhancing justice?Tamara Garcia & Ronald Sandler - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (3):277-287.
Enhancement Technologies and the Modern Self.C. Elliott - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):364-374.
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.
Enhancement's place in medicine.P. D. Scripko - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (5):293-296.
The Rhetoric of Enhancing the Human: Examining the Tropes of "the Human" and "Dignity" in Contemporary Bioethical Debates over Enhancement Technologies.Kurt Zemlicka - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (3):257-279.
From cognitive to moral enhancement: A possible reconciliation of religious outlooks and the biotechnological creation of a better human.Vojin Rakic - 2012 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 11 (31):113-128.
Is Human Enhancement also a Personal Matter?Vincent Menuz, Thierry Hurlimann & Béatrice Godard - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):161-177.
Defending human enhancement technologies: unveiling normativity.Inmaculada de Melo-Martin - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (8):483-487.
Associative strength growth produced via category membership.Nancy Henry & James F. Voss - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (1p1):136.
State neutrality and the ethics of human enhancement technologies.John Basl - 2010 - AJOB 1 (2):41-48.
Should we enhance animals?S. Chan - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (11):678-683.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-03

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christine Overall
Queen's University

Citations of this work

Healthcare Priorities: The “Young” and the “Old”.Ben Davies - 2023 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (2):174-185.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references