Technology Assessment, Public Policy and Transplantation: A Restrained Appraisal of the Massachusetts Task Force Approach

&
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 13 (3):106-111 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1748-720x.1985.tb00896.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Technology Assessment, Public Policy and Transplantation: A Restrained Appraisal of the Massachusetts Task Force Approach.Thomas D. Overcast & Roger W. Evans - 1985 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 13 (3):106-111.
A Clinician's View of the Massachusetts Task Force on Organ Transplantation.Ward Casscells - 1985 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 13 (1):27-28.
A Clinician's View of the Massachusetts Task Force on Organ Transplantation.Ward Casscells - 1985 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 13 (1):27-28.
Regulating Heart and Liver Transplants in Massachusetts: An Overview of the Report of the Task Force on Organ Transplantation.George J. Annas - 1985 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 13 (1):4-7.
Regulating Heart and Liver Transplants in Massachusetts: An Overview of the Report of the Task Force on Organ Transplantation.George J. Annas - 1985 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 13 (1):4-7.
Legitimation problems of participatory processes in technology assessment and technology policy.Thomas Saretzki - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):7-26.
Global Ethics and Nanotechnology: A Comparison of the Nanoethics Environments of the EU and China. [REVIEW]Sally Dalton-Brown - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (2):137-150.
Ethical analyses in the development of congressional public policy.Gladys B. White - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (5):575-585.
The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science: Commentary on: “Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology”.Rinie van Est - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.
The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science.Rinie Est - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.
Interactive technology assessment of paediatric cochlear implantation.Rob Reuzel - 2004 - Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):119-137.
One size fits all? On the institutionalization of participatory technology assessment and its interconnection with national ways of policy-making: the cases of Switzerland and Austria.Erich Griessler - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):61-80.
Animal spare parts? A canadian public consultation on xenotransplantation.Edna F. Einsiedel & Heather Ross - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):579-591.
Why do we still need participatory technology assessment?Leonhard Hennen - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):27-41.
Directed Donation: A Critical Examination of the Values Underlying Organ Donation and Allocation Policy.Mark D. Fox - 1997 - Dissertation, Vanderbilt University

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-02

Downloads
11 (#1,075,532)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references