Social Philosophy Today 20:183-193 (2004)
AbstractThis paper explores, from a feminist perspective, the justification of major surgical reshaping of the body. I define “transracialism” as the use of surgery to assist individuals to “cross” from being a member of one race to being a member of another. If transsexualism, involving the use of surgery to assist individuals to “cross” from female to male or from male to female, is morally acceptable, and if providing the medical and social resources to enable sex crossing is not morally problematic, then transracialism should be morally acceptable, and providing medical and social resources to facilitate race crossing is not necessarily morallyproblematic. To explore this idea, I present and evaluate eight possible arguments that might be given against accepting transracialism, and I show that each of them is unsuccessful.
Similar books and articles
Transsexualism: a medical perspective.C. N. Armstrong - 1980 - Journal of Medical Ethics 6 (2):90-91.
Adult Male-to-Female Transsexualism.Roberto Vitelli - 2015 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 46 (1):33-68.
Transsexualism in Society: A Sociology of Male-to-Female Transsexuals by Frank Lewins.Bryan S. Turner - 1996 - Body and Society 2 (4):115-117.
Intersexuality: what should careproviders do now.Edmund G. Howe - 1997 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 9 (4):337-344.
Transracialism, multiculturalism, and community.John Murphy, Jung Choi & Karen Callaghan - 2006 - Filosofija. Sociologija 17 (3).
Cutting to the Core: Exploring the Ethics of Contested Surgeries.David Benatar (ed.) - 2006 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
The Man Who Would Be Queen: The Science of Gender-Bending and Transsexualism.Bernice L. Hausman - 2005 - Journal of Medical Humanities 26 (2-3):195-198.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Changing Race, Changing Sex: The Ethics of Self-Transformation.Cressida J. Heyes - 2006 - Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (2):266-282.
References found in this work
No references found.