The curious idea that Māori once counted by elevens, and the insights it still holds for cross-cultural numerical research

Journal of the Polynesian Society 1 (129):59-84 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The idea the New Zealand Māori once counted by elevens has been viewed as a cultural misunderstanding originating with a mid-nineteenth-century dictionary of their language. Yet this “remarkable singularity” had an earlier, Continental origin, the details of which have been lost over a century of transmission in the literature. The affair is traced to a pair of scientific explorers, René-Primevère Lesson and Jules Poret de Blosseville, as reconstructed through their publications on the 1822–1825 circumnavigational voyage of the Coquille, a French corvette. Possible explanations for the affair are briefly examined, including whether it might have been a prank by the Polynesians or a misunderstanding or hoax on the part of the Europeans. Reasons why the idea of counting by elevens remains topical are discussed. First, its very oddity has obscured the counting method actually used—setting aside every tenth item as a tally. This “ephemeral abacus” is examined for its physical and mental efficiencies and its potential to explain aspects of numerical structure and vocabulary (e.g., Mangarevan binary counting; the Hawaiian number word for twenty, iwakalua), matters suggesting material forms have a critical if underappreciated role in realising concepts like exponential value. Second, it provides insight into why it can be difficult to appreciate highly elaborated but unwritten numbers like those found throughout Polynesia. Finally, the affair illuminates the difficulty of categorising number systems that use multiple units as the basis of enumeration, like Polynesian pair-counting; potential solutions are offered.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Constructing a concept of number.Karenleigh Overmann - 2018 - Journal of Numerical Cognition 2 (4):464–493.
Counting and the natural numbers.Jeffrey F. Sicha - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (3):405-416.
Kaupapa Māori Health Research.Fiona Cram - 2019 - In Pranee Liamputtong (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer Singapore. pp. 1507-1524.
Counting as a Type of Measuring.David Liebesman - 2016 - Philosophers' Imprint 16.
Look ma, no fingers! Are children numerical solipsists?Peter Gordon - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):654-655.
A Counter-Colonial Speculation on Elizabeth Rata’s –ism.Carl Mika - 2016 - Journal of World Philosophies 1 (1):1-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-27

Downloads
406 (#51,035)

6 months
123 (#34,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karenleigh Anne Overmann
University of Colorado, Colorado Springs

Citations of this work

Finger-counting and numerical structure.Karenleigh A. Overmann - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 2021 (12):723492.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Language and Problems of Knowledge.Noam Chomsky - 1989 - Studia Logica 48 (1):132-133.
Language and Problems of Knowledge.Noam Chomsky - 1997 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 16 (2).
Constructing a concept of number.Karenleigh Overmann - 2018 - Journal of Numerical Cognition 2 (4):464–493.
Brouwer's Cambridge lectures on intuitionism.Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer - 1981 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by D. van Dalen.

View all 6 references / Add more references