The Scientific Community as Audience: Toward a Rhetorical Analysis of Science

Philosophy and Rhetoric 10 (3):143 - 164 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Rhetoric and Scientific Rationality.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:235 - 246.
A rhetorical analysis of apologies for scientific misconduct: Do they really mean it?Lawrence Souder - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):175-184.
Rhetoric and realism.Rom Harré - 1996 - Theoria 11 (1):41-47.
Science fans: A basic description and analysis of the emergence of a pseudoscience movement in china.Song Tian - unknown
Taking Gender Seriously in Philosophy of Science.Helen E. Longino - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:333 - 340.
Art and the educated audience.James O. Young - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 44 (3):29-42.
Teaching, Learning, Describing, and Judging via Wittgensteinian Rules: Connections to Community. [REVIEW]Domenic F. Berducci - 2010 - Human Studies 33 (4):445-463.
A clash of competing metaphors.Michael Bradie - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):887-887.
The role of ethnography in rhetorical analysis: The new rhetorical turn.Richard Wilkins & Karen Wolf - 2011 - Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 3 (1):7-23.
On misunderstanding science.Guy Robinson - 1996 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 4 (1):110 – 127.
Co-responsibility for research integrity.Carl Mitcham - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):273-290.
Making the audience a key participant in the science communication process.Carol L. Rogers - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):553-557.
Scientific controversies: philosophical and historical perspectives.Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.) - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Social constructivism and the aims of science.Kareem Khalifa - 2010 - Social Epistemology 24 (1):45 – 61.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
15 (#893,994)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The experimenters' regress: from skepticism to argumentation.Benoı̂t Godin & Yves Gingras - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):133-148.
Did Habermas Cede Nature to the Positivists?Gordon R. Mitchell - 2003 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 36 (1):1-21.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references