Health Care Analysis 20 (3):268-280 (2012)

Alan Cribb
Victoria University of Manchester
This paper considers proposals for developing ‘co-productive’ medical partnerships, within the UK National Health Service (NHS), concentrating in particular on the potential problem involved in combining professional and lay conceptions of health. Much of the literature that advocates the introduction of co-productive healthcare partnerships assumes that medical professionals and patients share, or can easily come to share, a common set of beliefs about what is valuable with regard to health interventions and outcomes. However, a substantial literature documents the contestability of the concept of health, particular across professional and lay divides. We suggest that this potential disagreement ought to be taken seriously, and suggest that the prospect of a co-productive NHS in which patients and professionals act in partnership is threatened by the existence of unresolved epistemic differences. We suggest that part of the solution may lie in re-framing this potential disagreement in the terms provided by Engel’s bio-psycho-social account of health, and demonstrate how support for this account can be grounded upon a critical realist foundation. What we call a ‘stratified conception of health’ reveals the potential complementarity between health beliefs which may have at first seemed to be essentially contradictory. We consider some of the practical implications this idea has for conceiving and creating co-productive medical partnerships
Keywords Bio-psycho-social  Co-production  Critical realism  Medical partnership  NHS  Patient choice  Personalisation  Shared decision making
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10728-011-0186-8
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,039
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly.Norman Daniels - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Health as a Theoretical Concept.Christopher Boorse - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (4):542-573.
Just Health Care.Norman Daniels - 1985 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Lay Obligations in Professional Relations.Martin Benjamin - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (1):85-103.
Concepts of Health and Disease.Jozsef Kovacs - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):261-267.
Health as a Theoretical Concept.Christopher Boorse - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (4):542-573.
Autonomy and Futility.William H. Bruening - 1992 - HEC Forum 4 (5):305-313.
The Limits of Medical Practice.Ingemar Nordin - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (2):105-123.
Towards a Just, Courageous, and Honest Resolution of the Futility Debate.Rosemarie Tong - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):165-189.


Added to PP index

Total views
14 ( #731,687 of 2,505,224 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,206 of 2,505,224 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes