Deliberation and the first person

In Anthony Hatzimoysis (ed.), Self-Knowledge. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophers like Shoemaker and Burge argue that only self-conscious creatures can exercise rational control over their mental lives. In particular they urge that reflective rationality requires possession of the I-concept, the first person concept. These philosophers maintain that rational creatures like ourselves can exercise reflective control over belief as well as action. I agree that we have this sort of control over our actions and that practical freedom presupposes self-consciousness. But I deny that anything like this is true of belief.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,411

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deliberation and the First-Person Perspective.Jens Dam Ziska - 2016 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):35-57.
Reflection and Responsibility.Pamela Hieronymi - 2014 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 42 (1):3-41.
The courage of conviction.Sarah K. Paul - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (5-6):1-23.
An Essay on Doxastic Agency.Andrei A. Buckareff - 2005 - Dissertation, University of Rochester
Deciding to Believe Redux.Andrei A. Buckareff - 2014 - In Rico Vitz & Jonathan Matheson (eds.), The Ethics of Belief: Individual and Social. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 33-50.
Doxastic Self-Control.Sarah K. Paul - 2015 - American Philosophical Quarterly 52 (2):145-58.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
77 (#226,988)

6 months
4 (#1,501,142)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Rationalism about Obligation.David Owens - 2008 - European Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):403-431.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references