Classical Quarterly 10 (1-2):84- (1960)

Abstract
The following suggestions for the interpretation of Parmenides and Melissus can be grouped for convenience about one problem. This is the problem whether, as Aristotle thought and as most commentators still assume, Parmenides wrote his poem in the broad tradition of Ionian and Italian cosmology. The details of Aristotle's interpretation have been challenged over and again, but those who agree with his general assumptions take comfort from some or all of the following major arguments. First, the cosmogony which formed the last part of Parmenides' poem is expressly claimed by the goddess who expounds it to have some measure of truth or reliability in its own right, and indeed the very greatest measure possible for such an attempt. Second, the earlier arguments of the goddess prepare the ground for such a cosmogony in two ways. For in the first place these arguments themselves start from assumptions derived from earlier cosmologists, and are concerned merely to work out the implications of this traditional material. And, in the second place, they end by establishing the existence of a spherical universe: the framework of the physical world can be secured by logic even if the subsequent introduction of sensible qualities or ‘powers’ into this world marks some decline in logical rigour
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0009838800024423
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,586
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Monism.Jonathan Schaffer - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
How Many Doxai Are There in Parmenides?Panagiotis Thanassas - 2006 - Rhizai. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 2:199-218.
The ‘Two Worlds’ Theory in the Phaedo.Gail Fine - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (4):557-572.

View all 27 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

How to Be an Eleatic Monist.Michael C. Rea - 2001 - Noûs 35 (s15):129-151.
Eleatic Motions.Wallace Matson - 1984 - Philosophical Inquiry 6 (3-4):184-201.
Elements of Eleatic Ontology.Montgomery Furth - 1968 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 6 (2):111.
Eleatic Pluralism.R. B. B. Wardy - 1988 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 70 (2):125-146.
Armstrong on the Eleatic Principle and Abstract Entities.Graham Oddie - 1982 - Philosophical Studies 41 (2):285 - 295.
Eleatic Monism in Zeno and Melissus.Patricia Kenig Curd - 1993 - Ancient Philosophy 13 (1):1-22.
Plato's Politicus, an Eleatic Sophist on Politics.V. Tejera - 1978 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 5 (1):106-125.
Atomism's Eleatic Roots.David Sedley - 2008 - In Patricia Curd & Daniel W. Graham (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Form and Good in Plato’s Eleatic Dialogues.Scott Berman - 1996 - Ancient Philosophy 16 (2):487-491.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-12-09

Total views
137 ( #66,844 of 2,348,756 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #72,146 of 2,348,756 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes