Eleatic Questions

Classical Quarterly 10 (1-2):84- (1960)
Abstract
The following suggestions for the interpretation of Parmenides and Melissus can be grouped for convenience about one problem. This is the problem whether, as Aristotle thought and as most commentators still assume, Parmenides wrote his poem in the broad tradition of Ionian and Italian cosmology. The details of Aristotle's interpretation have been challenged over and again, but those who agree with his general assumptions take comfort from some or all of the following major arguments. First, the cosmogony which formed the last part of Parmenides' poem is expressly claimed by the goddess who expounds it to have some measure of truth or reliability in its own right, and indeed the very greatest measure possible for such an attempt. Second, the earlier arguments of the goddess prepare the ground for such a cosmogony in two ways. For in the first place these arguments themselves start from assumptions derived from earlier cosmologists, and are concerned merely to work out the implications of this traditional material. And, in the second place, they end by establishing the existence of a spherical universe: the framework of the physical world can be secured by logic even if the subsequent introduction of sensible qualities or ‘powers’ into this world marks some decline in logical rigour
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0009838800024423
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,440
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A Lesniewskian Reading of Ancient Ontology: Parmenides to Democritus.Paul Thom - 1986 - History and Philosophy of Logic 7 (2):155-166.
Parmenides on Ascertainment of the Real.T. M. Robinson - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (4):623 - 633.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
How to Be an Eleatic Monist.Michael C. Rea - 2001 - Noûs 35 (s15):129-151.
Technê and the Good in Plato's Statesman and Philebus.George Harvey - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (1):pp. 1-33.
Can the Eleatic Principle Be Justified?Mark Colyvan - 1998 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):313 - 335.
Eleatic Motions.Wallace Matson - 1984 - Philosophical Inquiry 6 (3-4):184-201.
Elements of Eleatic Ontology.Montgomery Furth - 1968 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 6 (2):111.
Eleatic Pluralism.R. B. B. Wardy - 1988 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 70 (2):125-146.
Armstrong on the Eleatic Principle and Abstract Entities.Graham Oddie - 1982 - Philosophical Studies 41 (2):285 - 295.
Eleatic Monism in Zeno and Melissus.Patricia Kenig Curd - 1993 - Ancient Philosophy 13 (1):1-22.
Plato's Politicus, an Eleatic Sophist on Politics.V. Tejera - 1978 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 5 (1):106-125.
Atomism's Eleatic Roots.David Sedley - 2008 - In Patricia Curd & Daniel W. Graham (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Form and Good in Plato's Eleatic Dialogues.Scott Berman - 1996 - Ancient Philosophy 16 (2):487-491.
Added to PP index
2010-12-09

Total downloads
78 ( #68,515 of 2,180,373 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #302,815 of 2,180,373 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums