Fall and Redemption: the Romantic alternative to liberal pessimism

Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2017 (178):33-53 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

From Machiavelli via Hobbes, Locke and Grotius to J.S. Mill and John Rawls, the liberal (and republican) tradition pivots about the primacy of the individual over all forms of human association and allied to this primacy is the replacing of notions of substan¬tive goodness or truth with the ultimate foundation of society upon subjective rights secured by the power of the central state. Those rights are grounded in the human will and the artifice of the social contract that has supplanted older ideas of covenantal relationships governed by a logic of reciprocity or gift-exchange. Liberalism is therefore inherently atomistic and oscillates between the isolated individual and some collective unity either objectively compounded or artificially supposed – ‘Leviathan’ was both. By positing an asocial ‘state of nature’, liberal contractualism purports to invent the artificial order of politics. By contrast, Romanticism – in the works of Novalis, Schlegel, Carlyle, Coleridge, de Biran and Bulgakov – develops develop in novel ways the ancient and Christian idea that human beings as social, political creatures have a natural desire for objective, substantive values by which to orientate their lives and give them that coherent shape which alone engenders a sense of real fulfilment. This teleological space cannot be equated with the impersonal, absolute sovereignty of national states and transnational markets but requires interpersonal relations within a mediated polity that has a transcendent outlook. So whereas liberalism merely regulates the evil and violence which it views as primary (and which therefore it perpetuates and even reinforces), Romanticism offers a vision of partial redemption in this life just because the Fall and original sin never fully destroyed the fundamentally peaceful, ontological ordering of the world. Rather, as fallen creatures equally capable of vice and virtue, human beings can discover their own particular purpose and place in society that is ordered to the good of the whole cosmos ultimately rooted in God’s creative action. By practising virtue, we can be redeemed in this life up to a point and we can begin to redeem the promise of an original harmony.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophical Myths of the Fall.Stephen Mulhall - 2007 - Princeton University Press.
The Problem of Value for Liberalism.Joo Sung Kim - 1990 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
Defending Liberal Neutrality.John David Walker - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
John locke and liberal nationalism.David Resnick - 1992 - History of European Ideas 15 (4-6):511-517.
The Politics of Virtue: Post-Liberalism and the Human Future.John Milbank & Adrian Pabst - 2015 - New York: Rowman & Littlefield International. Edited by Adrian Pabst.
Human Sexuality in the History of Redemption.Paul Ramsey - 1988 - Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (1):56 - 86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-07

Downloads
11 (#1,075,532)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

.Leszek Kołakowski - 2004 - Dialogue and Universalism 14 (1-2):13-14.
Paul against Biopolitics.John Milbank - 2008 - Theory, Culture and Society 25 (7-8):125-172.
Oikonomia in the age of empires.Dotan Leshem - 2013 - History of the Human Sciences 26 (1):29-51.
The Concept of the Political: Expanded Edition.George Schwab (ed.) - 2007 - University of Chicago Press.

Add more references