Argumentation, decision and rationality

From a decision theoretic perspective, arguments stem from decisions made by arguers. Despite some promising results, this approach remains underdeveloped in argumentation theories, mostly because it is assumed to be merely descriptive. This assumption is mistaken: considering arguments as the product of decisions brings into play various normative models of rational choice. The challenge is rather to reconcile strategic rationality with other normative constraints relevant for argumentation, such as inferential validity and dialectical appropriateness.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,000
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Manifest Rationality.Ralph Johnson - 2000 - Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

View all 38 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of Argumentation.Vasco Correia - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (2):222-241.


Added to PP index

Total views
9 ( #726,426 of 2,236,147 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #368,805 of 2,236,147 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature