Bivalence: Meaning theory vs metaphysics

Theoria 64 (2-3):157-186 (1998)
This paper is an attack on the Dummett-Prawitz view that the principle of bivalence has a crucial double significance, metaphysical and meaning theoretical. On the one hand it is said that holding bivalence valid is what characterizes a realistic view, i.e. a view in metaphysics, and on the other hand it is said that there are meaning theoretical arguments against its acceptability. I argue that these two aspects are incompatible. If the failure of validity of bivalence depends on properties of linguistic meaning, then there are no metaphysical consequences to be drawn. The case for this view is straightforward as long as we are discussing a language different from our own. But it seems that the distinction between failure because of meaning and failure because of reality cannot be applied to our own language, simply because our own language is just what we use to represent reality. I argue that this impression is illusory. In order to draw a conclusion about reality, meaning must be connected with truth in a non-trivial way, and precisely this cannot be done in the language for which the meaning theory itself is correct.
Keywords Realism-essay
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1755-2567.1998.tb00186.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,165
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Word and Object.W. V. Quine - 1960 - MIT Press.
Realism.Michael Dummett - 1982 - Synthese 52 (1):145--165.
Intuitionism.A. Heyting - 1956 - Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co..

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A History of Theoria.Sven Ove Hansson - 2009 - Theoria 75 (1):2-27.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Is Putnam's Causal Theory of Meaning Compatible with Internal Realism?Valer Ambrus - 1999 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 30 (1):1-16.
Theory of Meaning.Adrienne Lehrer - 1970 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.
The Seas of Language.Michael A. E. Dummett - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
Ruling-Out Realism.Peter Carruthers - 1985 - Philosophia 15 (1-2):61-78.
Meaning.Paul Horwich - 1998 - Oxford University Press.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

120 ( #40,823 of 2,171,976 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #326,556 of 2,171,976 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums